Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 518 total)
Actually IIRC, all of the databases involved in replication can be set to simple.
I've never done this on the publisher/subscriber since any database important enough to be replicated is typically...
October 5, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Check your parallelism. You may have been doing something like maxdop 1 on 2000, and 0 on 2005, which can cause huge performance swings (in either direction).
Also do a full...
October 5, 2010 at 12:01 pm
SKYBVI (10/5/2010)
So, that means if it does ping successfully, then no need to check configuration manager?
OR
both are different and have to be checked seperately to ensure proper working...
October 5, 2010 at 9:19 am
Shouldn't it be something like
INSERT INTO INVOICES
VALUES (xx,xx,xx,xx)
There is no Values or Select in your statement...I've never tried without it but I would imagine that would throw an error.
October 5, 2010 at 9:18 am
SKYBVI (10/5/2010)
@ derrickWhat is the difference between checking this(pinging) and opening the sql server configuration manager and seeing if the sql server, agent, etc are running/???
Regards,
Sushant
The services could be running...
October 5, 2010 at 9:13 am
To check to see if SQL is connectable, your best bet would be trying Telnet to the port it's on
i.e. if you're using the default instance, open a cmd prompt...
October 5, 2010 at 9:01 am
Lowell (10/5/2010)
bump, as I wanted to know if kras followed up on the reasoning behind wanting to drop the production database.
Wait, we need "reasons" for this kind of thing now?
Since...
October 5, 2010 at 8:59 am
October 5, 2010 at 8:35 am
This works for me fine...syntax-wise anyway. All I did was change the data types to nvarchar(50) (adjust to the proper sizes based on data).
BEGIN
DECLARE @strQuery NVARCHAR(MAX)
...
October 4, 2010 at 3:53 pm
Michael Valentine Jones (9/30/2010)
October 4, 2010 at 3:49 pm
And unlike SQL 2005, you can actually uninstall a SP in 2008! woo!
We used to have peer to peer replication in SQL 2005 SP2, and I upgraded to SP3 without...
October 4, 2010 at 2:59 pm
This is possibly the scariest title I've ever read on a forum post.
October 4, 2010 at 2:56 pm
If they have the SA password, what's to stop them from just restoring a backup to another name or on another server and having all the info there? Or creating...
October 4, 2010 at 2:23 pm
Tracing to a file sounds like the best option then.
I take it there's no way for you to just explicitly deny select on any tables you don't want them accessing?
October 4, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Is it the default instance? Using a static/default port (1433)?
If so, could try adding a hosts file entry for it, since you can't do replication via IP/FQDN/etc. I've had to...
October 4, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 518 total)