Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 824 total)
Unfortunately I haven't had much time to play with the early Beta of SQL 2005. However, from what I have seen and heard, the locking will remain largely the same...
December 2, 2004 at 9:25 am
Thanks for the clarification. I had not thought of that interpretation of what I said...
November 26, 2004 at 6:31 pm
It is generally very bad practice to wait for user input inside a transaction. But the scenario you lay out would be a worst-case. Not only would you have to...
November 16, 2004 at 3:23 pm
I'm not a programmer and don't pretend to be one so I won't be the one to effectively address your COM+ transaction questions. I could address the issue at a...
November 16, 2004 at 7:35 am
That is exactly what I meant, but I did not mean to imply that the cost was entirely paid in performance or that it couldn't be mitigated by other factors. ...
November 15, 2004 at 10:18 am
Thank you. The next article (scheduled for publication on Nov 24th will deal pretty extensively with error handling. The third (submitted but no publish date yet) deals with Locks and Isolation...
November 15, 2004 at 9:08 am
You misunderstand, I am emphatically stating that XML is NOT the answer to anything. At its best XML is a bloated and inefficient method of data exchange. I am aware that...
October 20, 2004 at 9:07 am
Incremental and Differential backups are the same thing, or the terms are used interchangebly. However, differential backups DO NOT truncate the transaction log, only a transaction log backup does that. So...
October 19, 2004 at 4:28 pm
Don't register the nodes. Use the virtual server name or IP. The node you registered will cease working if the other node becomes the active one. If you use the virtual...
October 5, 2004 at 8:51 am
Paste the query in Query Analyzer and then hit Ctl+L, this shows the estimated execution plan for the query. You can then look at each part of the query and...
September 24, 2004 at 8:22 am
Sounds like a bad idea to me. The ObjectID, as I understand it, is not guaranteed to be unique over time. In other words, a given ObjectID will be unique...
September 23, 2004 at 1:03 pm
David,
Let me guess...The vendor in question probably doesn't use any sort of DRI either. That way nobody can make heads or tails of their database design (assuming there's any sense...
September 10, 2004 at 9:33 am
Whether the key is "natural" or a "surrogate" like IDENTITY makes no difference to this particular subject. Yes it is always possible for someone who has direct INSERT/UPDATE access to the...
September 9, 2004 at 2:14 pm
You are correct in saying that the JOIN to a MUCK table works, but what you are overlooking is that the result of the JOIN (or any other query) is only as...
September 9, 2004 at 8:50 am
Very well said!
I might add that the practical result of following the scientifically sound approach (the relational model) is that most of the complexity should be handled at the database level...
September 9, 2004 at 8:38 am
Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 824 total)