Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 471 total)
We have used WAST in the past. If you have a web based application this might work for you. There are better tools but the price is right....
June 11, 2008 at 10:13 am
Sounds like you might have a trigger that is firing and updating the same row that the stored procedure is updating. Did you try using SQL Profiler with...
May 22, 2008 at 3:02 pm
I agree up to a point. But if you inherit an environment where someone has created a number of tables with no primary keys, then this can be useful...
May 22, 2008 at 11:52 am
If you have purged a lot of data then you will have a lot of partially filled pages. By creating (as ALZDBA states) or rebuilding the clustered index...
May 19, 2008 at 9:30 am
Yes, this is useful. In fact I ran into a case yesterday where I was able to employ this method to remove duplicates from a table. And as...
May 15, 2008 at 8:01 am
I think the same idea applies to the SQL Native client. Everything is still SQL 2005. When you set the compatability level of a database to...
April 30, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Your English is fine. It is probably more the medium that we are using. Same problem with email. Good luck with what you are doing. ...
April 30, 2008 at 12:07 pm
I am not sure I understand what you mean by upgrading your clients connections, but yes the mechaninsm that you use to connect to the database must be compatible with...
April 30, 2008 at 11:24 am
After re-reading your question, perhaps I should add that you can only connect to SQL 2005 using the methods that SQL 2005 supports. Changing the compatibility level of...
April 30, 2008 at 8:39 am
No it should not effect your network connections. You are still connecting to the SQL 2005 database engine. By setting the compatibility level to 80 on your database...
April 30, 2008 at 8:33 am
Yes, generally they are complex quereies involving both inner and outer joins. SQL 2000 would join the Inner Join tables first since they were the most likely to reduce...
April 29, 2008 at 9:33 am
We are the vendor for our product. Our requirement was that the product still had to run on SQL 2000 and also on SQL 2005. We discovered...
April 29, 2008 at 8:38 am
jim.powers (4/29/2008)
Interestingly enough, our vendor has certified the product for SQL Server 2005 but they require the database to remain in compatibility mode 80.
Actually, that is what we did as...
April 29, 2008 at 8:23 am
Some vendors are like that. But be sure and test thoroughly as there will most likely be things that you encounter that will cause some problems. We have...
April 29, 2008 at 7:51 am
jim.powers (4/29/2008)
April 29, 2008 at 7:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 471 total)