Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,413 total)
You will not be able to run SQL Server from a CD without installing anything on the user's computer. What you can do -- but I suspect that is not...
April 11, 2005 at 1:00 am
See this article by SQL Server MVP Tibor Karaszi for an extensive explanation of the datetime datatype and how to solve problems like this one: http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
April 11, 2005 at 12:56 am
This should give you an idea of how you can solve it. Execute in Northwind:
SELECT *
FROM dbo.Employees
WHERE Country =
CASE
WHEN Title LIKE 'Sales%' THEN 'UK'...
April 8, 2005 at 8:12 am
No, all of the instances would have to share 2GB of memory.
April 8, 2005 at 5:20 am
There are differences concerning read-ahead reads between Standard and Enterprise Edition (Ent Ed does not have a fix amount of pages for read-ahead). That could perhaps make this problem only...
April 8, 2005 at 5:16 am
Also see this very similar question: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=8&messageid=173078
April 8, 2005 at 1:07 am
SET will only allow the expression on the right hand side to assign one value to the variable.
If you use SELECT, the statement might return several rows and only the...
April 8, 2005 at 1:05 am
Very nice to hear this! A big congratulation to you Frank, you definately deserve it.
Keep up the great work!
April 8, 2005 at 12:58 am
I would definately recommend going with the unions. A logical union is not slow in any way, however the implementation requires a distinct operation to remove any duplicates. Like Bert...
April 7, 2005 at 1:58 am
They are used by the diagram editor in EM.
April 7, 2005 at 12:56 am
>select * from orders where orderdate >='19960704' and orderdate select * from orders where orderdate between '19960704' and '19960716'
>Compare the execution plans and watch how the BETWEEN is internally resolved...
April 4, 2005 at 8:42 am
The + operator simply concatenates the string literal(s) with the varchar (or similar string data type) data from the column firstname.
April 4, 2005 at 8:37 am
You can use this:
GRANT CREATE VIEW TO login_name
April 4, 2005 at 8:31 am
To solve this you could use the HOLDLOCK and XLOCK locking hints, and run the select and update in a transaction. You could also implement some optimistic concurrency handling this...
April 4, 2005 at 8:19 am
I would assume they should both work. However, I think the best place to ask is in the SQL Server 2005 beta newsgroups.
http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=sqlserver2005&slcid=us
April 4, 2005 at 8:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,413 total)