Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,413 total)
Timestamp in SQL Server is not equivalent to the ANSI type timestamp. Timestamp in SQL Server can also be called by it's synonym, rowversion. In fact you should only use...
April 28, 2005 at 7:11 am
Uhm, you are running SQL Server 7 SP4.
April 28, 2005 at 4:53 am
That depends on how the table is used. If an index becomes fragmented then it shuold be defragmented, for instance by using reindex. But there arealso other ways, such as...
April 28, 2005 at 3:07 am
Scenario: The company owners are facing a tough decision. If the company has shipped more than X items today they will sell the company, otherwise not. They look at the...
April 28, 2005 at 2:21 am
In any case I would not let ITW make any modifications to the database directly. Script the actions ITW suggests and decide yourself whether or not to implement them.
April 28, 2005 at 2:09 am
Change the network packet size. The default is 4096 bytes, and the max batch string length is 65536 * network packet size. Note that changing this might have performance implications,...
April 28, 2005 at 1:09 am
SQL Server 2005 Beta 2 does not play well with SQL Server 2000 and is not recommended to be installed side-by-side. You should however be able to install the latest...
April 27, 2005 at 3:51 pm
This is one of the reasons why using bitmasks coded in ints is not really a good thing in SQL Server. I would probably store the flags in a separate...
April 27, 2005 at 3:20 pm
>My colleagues now want to add WITH (NOLOCK) to every SELECT statement. Is this wise?
Why does your colleagues want to use an RDBMS, or even a transaction-management system, at all?...
April 27, 2005 at 3:16 pm
What kind of application(s) are you running against this database? How do the applications connect to the server? Are you sure that you are protected against SQL Injection for instance?
April 27, 2005 at 2:57 pm
Hm, I hadn't seen your last post when I wrote mine. But I will let it stay if it is still valid.
April 27, 2005 at 8:54 am
As Kenneth hints, I would assume that there are actually differences in the parameters that are used for the differing executions. If so, then the problem is most probably skewed...
April 27, 2005 at 8:51 am
Inside the SQL Server 2000 User Mode Scheduler
The above article describes this in very good detail.
April 27, 2005 at 6:42 am
If you are asking if it is possible to give one session higher priority than another, then no that is not possible in SQL Server.
April 27, 2005 at 5:30 am
From how you have described your process, you should use SCOPE_IDENTITY to get the number.
A number assigned by an identity property is always used regardless of whether or not the...
April 27, 2005 at 2:36 am
Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,413 total)