Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,413 total)
Now I am wondering how to optimize personal edition for atleast 300 concurrent queries
You can't. The 'optimization' for 8 concurrent queries is not some specific confugration that you can change,...
August 5, 2005 at 9:24 am
By "the next day, I truncated the data and ran it again", do you actually mean you ran TRUNCATE? If you have foreign keys on the table you cannot run...
August 5, 2005 at 9:19 am
Oh yes, you are absolutely correct in that. Whenever I just need to get a feel for the number of rows in a table that is the wuery to run....
August 5, 2005 at 8:21 am
An "anyone-of-a-lot-of-possible-persons" question.
August 5, 2005 at 8:12 am
Both primary keys and unique constraints are enforced by SQL Server with a unique index, so there is no need to create it yourself.
August 5, 2005 at 8:08 am
Oh, and also, rowqcnt is no different from rows. The latter column is only there for backwards compatibility, but both of them have the same problem with not always being...
August 5, 2005 at 7:54 am
A table that does not have a clustered index is called a heap, and it will show up in sysindexes with indid = 0. If a table does have a...
August 5, 2005 at 7:52 am
Not exactly, it means that you should not rely on that value being correct. In fact, the general advice regarding anything with system tables is that you should not depend...
August 5, 2005 at 7:49 am
Even though the SQL Server engine might use parallellism to execute a query quicker (though highly unlikely with these queries), it does not mean that the clients suddenly become asynchronous....
August 5, 2005 at 7:47 am
This should work I think:
DECLARE @year INT, @isoweek INT
SET @year = 2005
SET @isoweek = 31
SELECT
DATEADD(d, (@isoweek - 1) * 7,
CASE (DATEPART(dw, CAST(@year...
August 5, 2005 at 5:31 am
I would probably do something like this:
1. Create a new set of files in a new filegroup. I would not create 2x250GB files, since that is just asking for the...
August 5, 2005 at 2:37 am
Raj, I just reread the entire thread and see now that I misunderstood you a little. If I understand you correctly, you will always drop the (target) table and recreate...
August 5, 2005 at 1:36 am
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any info on it available. At least I couldn't find any. Post a link here if you do. I heard her talking about it...
August 5, 2005 at 1:06 am
Yep, what you want to do instead is look for autocreated stats and probably create an index for those columns, since SQL Server is basically saying to you that it...
August 4, 2005 at 8:36 am
I do not know what there is out already in the DBA space, but Beachemin et. al.'s "A first look at SQL Server 2005 for developers" is very good at...
August 4, 2005 at 8:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,413 total)