Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,413 total)
Hmm, yes of course. Is it not at all possible to say it that way in English, or was it just that in that context it could be interpreted the...
August 24, 2005 at 12:00 am
In some cases that is true. But not if the object is stored in multiple files, since then the algorithm for calculating extent scan fragmentation does not work as intended.
Even...
August 23, 2005 at 3:22 pm
You should be sending the value as a correctly typed parameter. That way you use the web server's settings to parse the input and create a typed value, then supply...
August 23, 2005 at 3:15 pm
As I implied above, it is impossible to give advice without knowing the specifics, because 'it always depends'. We can only make guesses. But the way I understand your question...
August 22, 2005 at 4:03 pm
Yes, whenever you are using a relation DBMS you should design correctly. It saves you time, gives you the best performance in most cases and most importantly avoids problems with...
August 22, 2005 at 3:29 pm
You are talking about application requirements. How the application works has nothing, absolutely nothing at all, with how the data should be modeled. The database is a collection of facts...
August 22, 2005 at 3:27 pm
Here is some more info on the subject.
August 22, 2005 at 3:13 pm
No. The reason why it is beneficial to put a log file on a single drive is that the log is always written to sequentially by SQL Server. That means...
August 22, 2005 at 1:17 pm
There does not seem to be much of a problem with fragmentation. Are you sure that the procedure is using an optimal execution plan? Are the statistics up to date?
August 22, 2005 at 1:05 pm
Yes, and those entries are read from the SGAM and PFS pages. That part is not really stored in every data page, it is just that DBCC PAGE fetches and...
August 22, 2005 at 1:02 pm
I guess this might not be the answer you want, but you should really change the design. That is just not proper design and you will spend much more time...
August 22, 2005 at 12:57 pm
Just to make sure. You are aware that you will need a separate physcial drive for each database's log file, right?
August 22, 2005 at 12:54 pm
See this post (same post by same author, different forum) where this is answered.
August 22, 2005 at 8:06 am
Like I said, MAX is about the fastest you can get. TOP 1 is an alternative, but performance will normally be very similar. With the index I specified above your...
August 22, 2005 at 6:13 am
What exactly do you mean with "The fields InpassNo,CompanyID and Finyear are Primary keys"?
To execute this query as fast as possible you should have a non-clustered index defined on (CompanyID,...
August 22, 2005 at 4:56 am
Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,413 total)