Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 310 total)
Hi Holger,
I found this (spid5):
Table error: IAM page (1:166529) (object ID 2, index ID 255) is out of the range of this database.
And for sure, this error concerning the CHECKDB:
DBCC...
October 3, 2006 at 8:16 am
Found my answers on the internet (thanks google).
To have this error there must be several conditions met:
- Having a table with a cluster index and a column of datatype image...
August 31, 2006 at 6:31 am
To be more precise : You can see it on the properties windows for the database (for the files). Or you can query it like this:
select
July 17, 2006 at 9:20 am
The problem was just that the SPLIT function cannot handle the space between each of the element passed to it:
This was ok: 'element1,element2,element3,...'
But not this: 'element1, element2, element3, ...'
I just...
July 11, 2006 at 6:16 am
Hello John,
Here is preliminary results:
For 898 element for the IN operator:
Using a derived table (SPLIT function):
Network Statistics
Number of server roundtrips 6
Number of TDS packets sent 6
Number of TDS...
July 10, 2006 at 8:54 am
Thanks Barsuk.
Same kind of issue.
Regards.
Carl
July 10, 2006 at 6:37 am
Hello John,
Hope you add a nice weekend.
You are right, I should (and I will test, test and retest) the three scenarios (something I began to put in place last week).
Best...
July 10, 2006 at 6:23 am
The SPLIT function used with ADO.NET does not seem to work properly (n.b. I hardcoded the separator instead of passing it to the function):
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM hasogl.pellpasc.stop s...
July 7, 2006 at 1:44 pm
Hello John,
at my sense this technique could not scale because every row inserted in the temp table will involve a round-trip to the DB server...
1000 values = 1000 round-trips.
For the...
July 7, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Hello John,
The values are dynamically chosen by the application user.
We are using ADO.NET.
Could you post an example on how we could build a derived table without using the split function?
Best...
July 7, 2006 at 12:27 pm
Thans a lot for your post.
I'll try it next week to see how the engine treat it and how it scales...
But I see a limit here:
Having a large INLIST often...
July 7, 2006 at 12:04 pm
Hello Mike,
thank's, I'll have a look at that as soon as possible.
Should be an improvement in SQL Server itself.
Regards,
Carl
December 20, 2005 at 10:27 am
A daily human check let an open door for huge problems... If an orphaned connection keep a table lock for an hour and everyone get kept in a busy wait...
December 20, 2005 at 9:33 am
Hello Mike,
No not exactly. We don't you extended stored procedure.
I talk about orphaned connections caused by an abnormal end of an application that was connected to the server.
But you can...
December 19, 2005 at 8:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 310 total)