Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 310 total)
Hello RGR'us,
at the beginning of this topic I mentionned that the database was case-sensitive...
So there is no other solution then using a computed column when the database is case-sensitive ans...
September 27, 2005 at 1:42 pm
Hello RGR'us,
I tried this method on a big table (1 508 468 rows) and it does not take the index.
I tried with the column having this collation Latin1_General_CS_AS and...
September 27, 2005 at 1:24 pm
Hello Gregory,
For sure, if I find something I'll let you (this forum) knows.
Best regards,
Carl
September 27, 2005 at 10:03 am
Hello Gregory,
We had a similar problem (twice) on one of our clients site. One of the parameter name was "corrupted".
We are unable to reproduce it either.
It was on an Update...
September 27, 2005 at 9:55 am
RGR'us,
Its always good to have the "big picture". Maybe your solution is applicable in our case but we have to see.
Many thanks
Carl
September 21, 2005 at 7:51 am
Hello RGR'us,
Using this approach don't seem to solve the indexing problem...
In fact the proper index is not used.
Maybe the only solution is to have a computed column?
Best regards,
Carl
September 21, 2005 at 7:13 am
Thank's RGR'us,
Short and simple.
Sometimes we tend to see things more complicated than it is, I should have thougth to this.
Carl
September 20, 2005 at 2:36 pm
Thanks RGR'us,
But what if the column must be case sensitive?
Because it is my point, the entire DB is case sensitive.
Best regards,
Carl
September 20, 2005 at 2:25 pm
I talked with my network guy and we finally found the problem.
TCP/IP was establishing sessions using ports ranging from 1024 to 5000.
But the fact that we were closing our connections...
September 9, 2005 at 10:58 am
Will,
When you say much slower, it seem to me that there is a problem somewhere. The difference between TCP/IP and Named Pipes should not be as significant.
Did you verify the...
September 2, 2005 at 7:24 am
Ok thanks Chris.
Principals and schemas are new features but it is not well explain in BOL.
When we want to restrict privileges on only one schema for a principals, it seems very...
August 26, 2005 at 7:22 am
Sorry its bêta 2 not bêta 3 (mistype).
August 25, 2005 at 6:42 am
Hello Farrel,
from Oracle 9.2 documentation:
The UNION
operator returns only distinct rows that appear in either result, while the UNION
ALL
...
August 25, 2005 at 6:30 am
Hello Chris,
Tanx for your help.
We are using CTP of june or bêta 3 (the last one).
Best regards,
Carl
August 25, 2005 at 6:06 am
No one tried this?
I would appreciate any feedback.
Regards,
Carl
August 24, 2005 at 1:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 310 total)