Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 47 total)
We saw this problem with developers when we went public and had to start following SARBOX constraints concerning separation of duties... boy was that fun (and still is!)
June 27, 2007 at 6:54 am
I got this to work using the sa account but not when I run it with a SQL Server account. I gave rights to the SQL Server account to execute...
March 23, 2007 at 8:24 am
Adam, I figured it out... in your example change the small q to a captial Q
Thanks again, Bob
March 21, 2007 at 3:54 pm
Thanks Adam... I had to tweak it just a bit but it works. One further question... when I run this from a command prompt, after it starts, there is a...
March 21, 2007 at 3:20 pm
Thanks to both of you for your responses. I see where what you say is true. In my specific case it is not a problem because these fields are part...
January 23, 2007 at 9:23 pm
I want to send the result set that it returns.
August 31, 2006 at 4:25 am
Yes... windows
January 24, 2006 at 11:43 am
It is a true 64-bit OS
January 24, 2006 at 5:09 am
Many thanks for the lesson... especially to govinn for the example... your example helped me perfectly!
Bob
September 23, 2005 at 12:43 pm
I'm not keeping it in two different tables. Someone is manually filling out a spreadsheet that will contain updated information for the table.
I've got 600+ employees in the SQL Server...
September 23, 2005 at 11:56 am
Thanks Noel,
I tried what you suggest and it works to a point (I'm pretty new at this so please consider this source!)
Here is the Stored Procedure I set up...****************************
CREATE PROCEDURE...
May 26, 2005 at 3:36 pm
In Query Analyzer, I get the exact same results from the following two queries...
SELECT {fn NOW()}
SELECT GETDATE()
May 19, 2005 at 2:27 pm
You got it, Dave!
Thanks very much...
February 3, 2005 at 6:48 pm
Would this same logic work with one of the variables being varchar and the other three being int?
February 3, 2005 at 5:26 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 47 total)