Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 7,429 total)
I would use an extra step plus this
if dateadd(d,-1,dateadd(m,datediff(m,0,getdate())+1,0))
begin
rsiserror('Last day of month',16,-1)
end
and set the job to on fail mark success on success go to next or something like that.
June 1, 2004 at 3:58 pm
That is when you track them down and beat them summarily. ![]()
June 1, 2004 at 3:48 pm
Take a look in the Google Groups here http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&q=sybase+%22master+device%22+%22DISK+RESIZE%22
June 1, 2004 at 3:43 pm
Try this for Query C
SELECT viewLLAttr_by_version_a.DataID,
oQ.[Name],
viewLLAttr_by_version_a.DefID,
viewLLAttr_by_version_a.DwgNo,
viewLLAttr_by_version_a.Sheet,
viewLLAttr_by_version_a.Version,
viewLLAttr_by_version_a.Title
FROM
viewLLAttr_by_version_a
INNER JOIN
(SELECT iQ.[Name], iQ.DataID, iQ.MaxVersionNum FROM viewDTree_MaxVersion_01 iQ WHERE iQ.[Name] LIKE '%parameter%')...
June 1, 2004 at 6:56 am
Run profiler against the server watching for exceptions, logons and logoffs. If the issue isn't with the TCP/IP stack then may be an internal SQL error blowing the connection out.
June 1, 2004 at 4:27 am
To test for sure use profiler as I don't have a way to test here.
May 30, 2004 at 8:47 am
First and foremost for easier administration on future needs I would create a role to give the permission to then assign the folks or groups to that role. That way...
May 29, 2004 at 8:21 am
Are any other packages connecting to an Oracle server and if not then are any other connectig to a SQL Server?
I assmue that would be yes, if so then...
May 29, 2004 at 8:16 am
I don't believe you can because the files are marked internally in the sysfiles table and they cannot be rename by hand. However I know you can back them up...
May 29, 2004 at 8:05 am
You can invoke a job via sp_start_job which is default to the public role so any account can do it. However if it is running at the time it cannot...
May 29, 2004 at 8:00 am
The answer is (at least at this point cause the future can always change) is no.
May 29, 2004 at 7:56 am
Ok without knowing the execution plan, the table structure, or indexes the query looks fine as is except maybe the LIKE could be your biggest slow down point.
However this is...
May 28, 2004 at 4:51 pm
You will run into this http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;303774 and may potentially have some user accounts not work afterwards (test them afterwards of change). Otherwise I recall nothing else specific unless you set...
May 28, 2004 at 3:57 pm
Look at your current execution plan, could be index could help or are you meaning is there a faste way to build query itself?
May 28, 2004 at 3:49 pm
Not understanding your reference can you point me to what you are reading or be a bit more detailed. You can create jobs in SQL to start the moment SQL...
May 28, 2004 at 3:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 7,429 total)