Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 91 total)
I'm not sure how MirrorView works, but I'd imagine it is similar to SR/DR. With SR/DF, the second array has the LUNs locked and can only receive the replicated...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 30, 2009 at 11:41 pm
I have checked one of our A/A clusters and it displays the same behaviour. A quick google provides the following from MVP Tara Kizer
http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=124857񷧩
Ignore the status of services in...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 30, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Hi SQLMonkey,
From a scalability point of view, single node clusters are very helpful. We deploy a number of our SQL systems on single node clusters so that we can...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 30, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Paul White (4/27/2009)
andrew.hatfield (4/27/2009)
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 27, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Paul White (4/27/2009)
andrew.hatfield (4/27/2009)
By definition those success stories are based on experience....or marketing deals :laugh:
Sometimes you just can't win 🙂
Paul White (4/27/2009)
andrew.hatfield (4/27/2009)
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 27, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Sorry, I missed the last bit in my reply.
Paul White (4/26/2009)
How would hardware utilization be improved by using virtualization? What other benefits would it bring?
Generally, you virtualise a number...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 27, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Hi Paul,
I've also worked for large organisations, but that's not the point. By definition those success stories are based on experience.
Looking at your example and highlighting that it is...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 27, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Here are some links regarding databases on VMWare
SQL Server Performance in a VMWare Infrastructure 3 Environment (VMWare and HP)
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/SQLServerWorkloads.pdf
VMWare and Dell Whitepaper http://www.vmware.com/pdf/SQL_Server_consolidation.pdf
Virtualised SQL Server Performance: Scalable and Reliable http://blogs.vmware.com/performance/2008/11/database-worklo.html
Customer...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 26, 2009 at 8:14 pm
Hi Paul,
With respect, I disagree. As I said, it depends on your workload. Not all systems are candidates for virtualisation. Often, large footprint systems are inappropriate. ...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 26, 2009 at 8:04 pm
That's a bit of a generalisation - all virtualisation = bad and all san = bad.
It depends on the workload of the environment, it's CPU and Memory footprint as well...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 26, 2009 at 12:20 am
First off, remember that HA is not DR. Microsoft Clustering provides a HA solution, not a DR solution.
It also depends on what you classify a disaster and what your...
--
Andrew Hatfield
April 26, 2009 at 12:13 am
VEB (2/9/2009)
Steve,I understand your idea. Excluding the accounts from Domain Users group would make them really rightless.
Remember that every account must have at least one primary group. If you...
--
Andrew Hatfield
February 9, 2009 at 4:07 pm
VEB (2/9/2009)
Steve,I understand your idea. Excluding the accounts from Domain Users group would make them really rightless.
Remember that every account must have at least one primary group. If you...
--
Andrew Hatfield
February 9, 2009 at 4:06 pm
This Microsoft KB article may help http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811889
--
Andrew Hatfield
February 8, 2009 at 11:58 pm
Andrew, do you mean all 3 services (Server, Agent, Browser) should run under domain accounts?
Each service should run under its own account with only the privileges it requires to run.
SQL...
--
Andrew Hatfield
February 4, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 91 total)