Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 692 total)
This article should help you: http://www.sommarskog.se/dyn-search.html
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 13, 2004 at 9:23 am
You can begin by posting the errors and the code that produces them.
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 13, 2004 at 8:45 am
Agreed completely. There are still plenty of sites on 7.0 and even some on 6.5. Getting 2000 certification now will be valuable for years to come (or at...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 8:51 am
Sunil,
If you search groups.google.com you can probably find some "brain dumps" of the exam... That may be helpful. You should also review all of the past questions of the...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 8:49 am
Julian,
Personally I tend to avoid ISNULL altogether; COALESCE behaves identically with only two values, and is a standard function as opposed to the proprietary ISNULL. One less thing to...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 8:25 am
David,
Hmm, let's see... For a table that has a list of countries... How about "Countries"?
Internationalization and schema naming schemes gets into some strange territory. The philosophical question must be...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 8:21 am
Thomas:
Navigation of an adjacency list requires looping or recursion. Itzik Ben-Gan has some articles showing some techniques for doing this; check the SQL Server Magazine archives here: http://www.winnetmag.com/Authors/AuthorID/638/638.html
The other...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 7:54 am
Can you put either an IF block or a CASE expression in to eliminate the error completely? Wouldn't you rather safely handle it?
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 7:46 am
David,
Enlighten us as to the contents of the mysterious A35020 table.
As for naming schemes, I personally think the common-sense scheme is best: Name the table based on whatever it contains!...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 10, 2004 at 7:40 am
I haven't ever had to maintain 300 lookup tables, but in an app that required around 150, each with between maybe 5 and 20 rows, it was pretty easy. ...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 9, 2004 at 1:38 pm
Ahh, yeah, I definitely agree with that ![]()
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 8, 2004 at 7:25 pm
I agree with Calvin Lawson on this, it's not a performance question but a maintenence question. For instance, CHECK constraints (CHECK x IN ('A', 'B', 'C')) will perform marginally better...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 8, 2004 at 7:01 pm
Here are two articles that argue the opposite:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/dsumlin/lookupstrategy.asp
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/nraghavendra/storekeystoringmiscdata.asp
You'll notice in one that I got into a battle with the author about it... ![]()
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 8, 2004 at 11:29 am
David,
When developers attempt to use these tables to get rid of JOINs, they'll convert this:
SELECT AuxTbl1.Value AS Aux1, AuxTbl2.Value AS Aux2
FROM SomeTable
JOIN AuxTbl1 ON SomeTable.AuxID1 = AuxTbl1.AuxID1
JOIN AuxTbl2 ON SomeTable.AuxID2...
--
Adam Machanic
whoisactive
September 8, 2004 at 10:51 am
Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 692 total)