Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 616 total)
Yup so now you just need to copy the result of the query then paste into a new query window and run (preferably one update at a time to be...
May 23, 2013 at 11:56 am
jennigirl (5/23/2013)
May 23, 2013 at 10:42 am
Eric M Russell (5/22/2013)
Abu Dina (5/21/2013)
Table structure:
The application which uses this table has been running slow for the last couple of...
May 23, 2013 at 10:22 am
Crude but quick way of doing this is to copy then run the outcome of a query like the below:
select 'update ' + table_name +
'set ' + column_name +...
May 23, 2013 at 9:59 am
KJKKPSI (5/23/2013)
What they would like it to do is parse out the individual statements and destinations from the variable values, and then preform the export based on that pairing. After...
May 23, 2013 at 9:50 am
I have another question. Any implications running DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS on a live system with this big table?
May 21, 2013 at 7:56 am
Lowell (5/21/2013)
Abu Dina (5/21/2013)
The 2.6 billion total is after the insert of the 400 million.
cool to have such big table, I'm actually a bit jealous, because it presents a lot...
May 21, 2013 at 7:46 am
The 2.6 billion total is after the insert of the 400 million.
May 21, 2013 at 7:17 am
Thanks to you both.
Not sure why I said index fragmentation. When my colleague mentioned it to me, the first thing I asked him was about the stats lol.
Was thinking along...
May 21, 2013 at 6:59 am
missing comma I think, try this:
Create database ToddTestDB On Primary
( Name = N'ToddTestDB',
FILENAME = N'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATAToddTestDB.MDF' , Size = 3072KB, -- this was missing!
MAXSIZE = UNLIMITED, FILEGROWTH =...
May 16, 2013 at 5:26 am
Join the club! I also have a number of deadlines looming so don't have the luxury to spend too much time on this.
Record linkage is a pain in the backside...
May 13, 2013 at 10:53 am
Thanks for all your help so far.
This is one way I've tried and it works I think but I'm sure you clever folks can come up with a better way...
May 13, 2013 at 6:30 am
Yes, there are a number of indirect relationships and it gave me a lot of headaches.
It's just gone past midnight here in the uk so I'm off to bed. Will...
May 12, 2013 at 5:03 pm
The original table is the product of a record linkage process. All the ids are linked together. I know it's hard to spot but if you go through each row...
May 12, 2013 at 3:02 pm
Unfortunately my solution isn't working as expected. Anyone else with suggestions?
Here is some sample data:
with SCC_CTE (Retained_ID, Dropped_ID)
AS (Select 15799, 8388 union all
select 52941,8388 union all
select 52941, 15799 union...
May 10, 2013 at 9:56 am
Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 616 total)