Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 254 total)
Yelena I believe addressed clustering in general. There are a number of people who believe that almost all tables should be clustered for maintenance/performance purposes and there are likely lots...
September 21, 2004 at 7:11 am
Please post to http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=5&messageid=137875 instead (duplicate post).
September 21, 2004 at 7:11 am
SQL Server needs to pick one and only one access path for your SELECT statement. Since there are 5 columns being compared it will assume that every one is being...
September 20, 2004 at 1:19 pm
Those are OS level shares and not in SQL Server. Under Windows NT you can detect them with the NET SHARE command, but basically talk to your network people about...
September 20, 2004 at 12:38 pm
Thanks a lot. Although not what I was looking for, it appears that I wasn't looking for the right thing. This does the trick very nicely. I was a little...
September 20, 2004 at 6:22 am
Incidentally, EM will tell you what T-SQL it is about to use. Make the desired changes to a table from design mode but do not save them yet. Very near...
September 17, 2004 at 12:29 pm
There may be a better way, but it occurred to me that the following should work at least for the most part.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=5&messageid=136926#bm137004
A more manual process would be to run...
September 17, 2004 at 12:16 pm
declare @FirstName varchar(100)
declare @LastName varchar(100)
FETCH NEXT FROM Employee_Cursor INTO @LastName, @FirstName
September 17, 2004 at 11:52 am
Actually Option 1 was to simply leave the data where it is and create a cross server SELECT statement. You can do that if you open a connection to the SQL...
September 17, 2004 at 6:36 am
Well, although I don't know this for certain, my supposition (and proof by expiramentation) is that the ORDER BY clause creates a temporary column for internal sorting when a sort value...
September 16, 2004 at 3:35 pm
Yet another. Its a single pass without a sort step.
declare @MaxNum int
declare @MaxNumMinOne int
set @MaxNum = 0
set @MaxNumMinOne = -1
SELECT @MaxNumMinOne = case when @MaxNum < ClientNumber then @MaxNum else...
September 16, 2004 at 3:19 pm
Look up sp_table_privileges and sp_table_privileges_ex in BOL.
September 16, 2004 at 2:31 pm
I expect someone else to have a better idea, but I believe Profiler could be used to monitor transactions. You could then record the results to a table for a...
September 16, 2004 at 11:27 am
Depends. The where clause you provided would be much faster, but that would require dynamic sql. If one of the two constants is a variable (which I expect is what...
September 16, 2004 at 11:23 am
If you need to originate from Oracle then that would be a problem. You could try an Oracle forum for something analagous to sp_addlinkedserver unless you already know there isn't...
September 16, 2004 at 8:37 am
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 254 total)