You are a SQL Server developer who is...

Question

You are a SQL Server developer who is...

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

SSC Guru

Points: 734418
More actions
January 9, 2008 at 4:49 pm

#63143

Comments posted to this topic are about the item You are a SQL Server developer who is...

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

kapil_kk SSC-Insane Points: 21316 More actions · Answer 1

nice question 🙂

_______________________________________________________________
To get quick answer follow this link:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/

akljfhnlaflkj SSC Guru Points: 76202 More actions · Answer 2

akljfhnlaflkj

SSC Guru

Points: 76202

April 6, 2016 at 6:42 am

#1870127

This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.

Ed Wagner SSC Guru Points: 287024 More actions · Answer 3

Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.

This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.

Tally Tables - Performance Personified
String Splitting with True Performance
Best practices on how to ask questions

Luis Cazares SSC Guru Points: 183698 More actions · Answer 4

Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.
This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.

And this functionality is no longer guaranteed to work as the ORDER BY will be ignored when using TOP 100 PERCENT.

Luis C.
General Disclaimer:
Are you seriously taking the advice and code from someone from the internet without testing it? Do you at least understand it? Or can it easily kill your server?

How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help: Option 1 / Option 2

Alan Burstein SSC Guru Points: 61136 More actions · Answer 5

Luis Cazares (4/6/2016)
Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.
This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.
And this functionality is no longer guaranteed to work as the ORDER BY will be ignored when using TOP 100 PERCENT.

Ed.. 3 1/2 year? Its from 2008, I haven't had any coffee so I can't tell you how long ago that was but I suspect it was longer than 3 1/2 years.

To Luis' point - for a presentation ORDER BY in a view (which I do sometimes just for testing) I do a TOP (1000000000000) which will not be ignored (nor does it affect the cardinality estimation when the optimizer create's a query plan).

"I cant stress enough the importance of switching from a sequential files mindset to set-based thinking. After you make the switch, you can spend your time tuning and optimizing your queries instead of maintaining lengthy, poor-performing code."

-- Itzik Ben-Gan 2001

Ed Wagner SSC Guru Points: 287024 More actions · Answer 6

Alan.B (4/6/2016)
Luis Cazares (4/6/2016)
Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.
This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.
And this functionality is no longer guaranteed to work as the ORDER BY will be ignored when using TOP 100 PERCENT.
Ed.. 3 1/2 year? Its from 2008, I haven't had any coffee so I can't tell you how long ago that was but I suspect it was longer than 3 1/2 years.
To Luis' point - for a presentation ORDER BY in a view (which I do sometimes just for testing) I do a TOP (1000000000000) which will not be ignored (nor does it affect the cardinality estimation when the optimizer create's a query plan).

Yeah, you're right. I looked at the "more recent" comment from 2012 to determine 3 1/2 years. It's actually 8 1/4 years old. Answering 8+ year-old questions must be a hobby or something just to clutter up the "Recent Posts" page. It's kind of like spam.

Tally Tables - Performance Personified
String Splitting with True Performance
Best practices on how to ask questions

Jacob Wilkins One Orange Chip Points: 27976 More actions · Answer 7

Jacob Wilkins

One Orange Chip

Points: 27976

April 6, 2016 at 10:07 am

#1870245

The question itself even says from 2003, so... 🙂

J Livingston SQL SSC Guru Points: 51550 More actions · Answer 8

Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Alan.B (4/6/2016)
Luis Cazares (4/6/2016)
Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.
This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.
And this functionality is no longer guaranteed to work as the ORDER BY will be ignored when using TOP 100 PERCENT.
Ed.. 3 1/2 year? Its from 2008, I haven't had any coffee so I can't tell you how long ago that was but I suspect it was longer than 3 1/2 years.
To Luis' point - for a presentation ORDER BY in a view (which I do sometimes just for testing) I do a TOP (1000000000000) which will not be ignored (nor does it affect the cardinality estimation when the optimizer create's a query plan).
Yeah, you're right. I looked at the "more recent" comment from 2012 to determine 3 1/2 years. It's actually 8 1/4 years old. Answering 8+ year-old questions must be a hobby or something just to clutter up the "Recent Posts" page. It's kind of like spam.

Points: 6,708, Visits: 662 "bragging rights" me thinks

________________________________________________________________
you can lead a user to data....but you cannot make them think
and remember....every day is a school day

Ed Wagner SSC Guru Points: 287024 More actions · Answer 9

J Livingston SQL (4/6/2016)
Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Alan.B (4/6/2016)
Luis Cazares (4/6/2016)
Ed Wagner (4/6/2016)
Iwas Bornready (4/6/2016)
This is great. I didn't know this simple trick.
This is a QOTD that's 3 1/2 years old.
And this functionality is no longer guaranteed to work as the ORDER BY will be ignored when using TOP 100 PERCENT.
Ed.. 3 1/2 year? Its from 2008, I haven't had any coffee so I can't tell you how long ago that was but I suspect it was longer than 3 1/2 years.
To Luis' point - for a presentation ORDER BY in a view (which I do sometimes just for testing) I do a TOP (1000000000000) which will not be ignored (nor does it affect the cardinality estimation when the optimizer create's a query plan).
Yeah, you're right. I looked at the "more recent" comment from 2012 to determine 3 1/2 years. It's actually 8 1/4 years old. Answering 8+ year-old questions must be a hobby or something just to clutter up the "Recent Posts" page. It's kind of like spam.
Points: 6,708, Visits: 662 "bragging rights" me thinks

You're probably right. It's not the usual "Thanks for the question" or "Thanks for the article" but almost. At least the spam isn't as frequent as the weekend spam about watching sporting events online.

Tally Tables - Performance Personified
String Splitting with True Performance
Best practices on how to ask questions