SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Single SQL 2008R2 Ent VM on host better than physical install?


Single SQL 2008R2 Ent VM on host better than physical install?

Author
Message
sotn
sotn
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 528 Visits: 469
We are going to migrate to a new server and we have a large virtual environment already, but we want as much performance as possible for this SQL server, so we are thinking a host dedicated for the single SQL 2008 R2 enterprise edition rather than have other VMs on the host, but apart from the management (DR/HA etc.) advantage of the virtualisation is this a bad idea compared to having a physical server with SSDs etc. especially for performance.

I guess this goes to the overhead of a hyper-v 2012 instance has to the SQL performance.

Thanks
Greg Edwards-268690
Greg Edwards-268690
SSCarpal Tunnel
SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 4058 Visits: 8592
Lots of factors can come into play.
Properly sized and setup, virtual is very comparable to physical, plus has some better recovery options.
Baselining and testing is the only real way to compare.
Making sure your new host addresses any pain points you may have now will give you a good start.
Generally speaking, the current host is likely larger than the new server will be.
If the new machine is the same as the current, you already will see increased performance due to eliminating any resource contentions.
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)SSC Guru (64K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 64353 Visits: 18570
I agree with Greg.

Looking at just one VM on the host seems to be overkill for the VM. If you are looking into DR that means a additional servers just for the SQL DR.



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

sotn
sotn
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (528 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 528 Visits: 469
Hi,

Actually it is more for performance, we have an 'old' vm at the moment 4 cpu 64gb ram etc. and want to upgrade to Ent edition and many more cpu's so move to hyper-v 2012 but am thinking if for performance we went 'back' to physical would that be faster than virtual with a dedicated host when we add another 200 users to our application
Greg Edwards-268690
Greg Edwards-268690
SSCarpal Tunnel
SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)SSCarpal Tunnel (4.1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 4058 Visits: 8592
sotn (5/29/2014)
Hi,

Actually it is more for performance, we have an 'old' vm at the moment 4 cpu 64gb ram etc. and want to upgrade to Ent edition and many more cpu's so move to hyper-v 2012 but am thinking if for performance we went 'back' to physical would that be faster than virtual with a dedicated host when we add another 200 users to our application


Microsoft has published whitepapers describing performance tuning for both environments.
You might also want to look at some of the appliance type offerings.
Out of the box, they are pretty well architected for performance.

Part of the overall picture includes additional load of 200 users - no indication of how many you have today.
And if it is just SQL Server, or SSRS, SSAS, etc.
Enterprise also offers some features that can enhance performance.
Be sure to consider licensing implications, especially if also going to a newer version of SQL Server.

Database design can have great impacts on performance.
Virtual vs. Physical - assuming both are done correctly - is not the main determination of speed.
Understand why and how much hardware you need.
It is very easy to spend a lot of money on hardware, and in the end be disappointed.

I used to have to justify even adding memory to a server.
And on server upgrades, had to justify, not assume, how much more hardware I needed.
Sounds like quite a different environment than yours.
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search