SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Less QA?


Less QA?

Author
Message
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 67545 Visits: 18570
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

Rod
Rod
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 7198 Visits: 2180
I totally agree with what you said, Miles. When something goes wrong with software I've worked on, I always assume it's my fault and look at what's happening with it. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, but I always own it, when I've made the mistake. I have worked with some developers who never accept responsibility for what they've done, and instead blame others. No fun.

Kindest Regards,Rod
Connect with me on LinkedIn.
Revenant
Revenant
SSChampion
SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 12615 Visits: 5010
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)SSC Guru (67K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 67545 Visits: 18570
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Heh - no

But if we want to open that can of worms we could through MS CRM or Dynamics



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

Revenant
Revenant
SSChampion
SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 12615 Visits: 5010
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Heh - no

But if we want to open that can of worms we could through MS CRM or Dynamics

Please don't -- too easy a target.
PhilipC
PhilipC
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 523 Visits: 1262
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Haha no, but it is a financial piece of software. Best left unnamed.

I just fail to see how databases without the base core of primary keys, foreign key constraints, indexes, etc can be overlooked in any database before shipping it out to a customer.
Revenant
Revenant
SSChampion
SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 12615 Visits: 5010
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Haha no, but it is a financial piece of software. Best left unnamed.

I just fail to see how databases without the base core of primary keys, foreign key constraints, indexes, etc can be overlooked in any database before shipping it out to a customer.

Have you ever looked into ReportServer database? Now that is a duly constituted part of SQL Server.
PhilipC
PhilipC
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 523 Visits: 1262
Revenant (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Haha no, but it is a financial piece of software. Best left unnamed.

I just fail to see how databases without the base core of primary keys, foreign key constraints, indexes, etc can be overlooked in any database before shipping it out to a customer.

Have you ever looked into ReportServer database? Now that is a duly constituted part of SQL Server.


A bit different though IMO as it isn't a true OLTP database.
Revenant
Revenant
SSChampion
SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 12615 Visits: 5010
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Haha no, but it is a financial piece of software. Best left unnamed.

I just fail to see how databases without the base core of primary keys, foreign key constraints, indexes, etc can be overlooked in any database before shipping it out to a customer.

Have you ever looked into ReportServer database? Now that is a duly constituted part of SQL Server.


A bit different though IMO as it isn't a true OLTP database.

Well yes, it is not OLTP, but IMO it ought to be an example of a good design. I was trying to make the point that it is not, unfortunately.
PhilipC
PhilipC
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (523 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 523 Visits: 1262
Revenant (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Revenant (7/31/2013)
SQLRNNR (7/31/2013)
PhilipC (7/31/2013)
Has anyone noticed how vendor databases in general are getting worse and worse? It seems we're getting to an age where regardless of quality, it's just get the product out the door as quickly as possible.

The company I work for just purchased a product which landed with me to install the database, and what I find is a database with very few tables actually having primary keys, no indexes and after a big data load they wonder why the performance is shot to hell.....


I am in the same boat with several of my clients.

They have vendor databases that are really pathetic in design and performance - and the vendor won't provide any real support other than to tell them to get better hardware.

You are not talking about SharePoint per chance, are you? :-)


Haha no, but it is a financial piece of software. Best left unnamed.

I just fail to see how databases without the base core of primary keys, foreign key constraints, indexes, etc can be overlooked in any database before shipping it out to a customer.

Have you ever looked into ReportServer database? Now that is a duly constituted part of SQL Server.


A bit different though IMO as it isn't a true OLTP database.

Well yes, it is not OLTP, but IMO it ought to be an example of a good design. I was trying to make the point that it is not, unfortunately.


Yeah that's a fair enough point. Most of time, it seems to be rapid development over quality development that wins out. As a DBA, it just becomes a nightmare trying to support these kind of databases and maintain some kind of performance level when the vendors show very little interest in improving things.
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search