Sean Lange (4/19/2013)
That is certainly interesting. I still think this is way over the top worried about naming conventions. This will be difficult to maintain when you have to update your procs and such.
I have to agree. I really think this is taking naming conventions and standards to an extreme. If it can't be done through the normal use of DDL statements without jumping through hoops to rename them after creation, it is unnecessary effort. Document that certain structures cannot be follow the standard without extra effort and leave it at that.
For better assistance in answering your questions, click hereFor tips to get better help with Performance Problems, click hereFor Running Totals and its variations, click here
or when working with partitioned tablesFor more about Tally Tables, click hereFor more about Cross Tabs and Pivots, click here
and hereManaging Transaction Logs
SQL Musings from the Desert Fountain Valley SQL
(My Mirror Blog)