Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


DBMS vs File Management System


DBMS vs File Management System

Author
Message
Dale Corey
Dale Corey
SSC-Addicted
SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)SSC-Addicted (483 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 483 Visits: 4
Comments posted to this topic are about the content posted at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/dcorey/dbmsvsfilemanagementsystem.asp


All the best,

Dale

Author: An Introduction to SQL Server 2005 Management Studio
ckempste
ckempste
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1017 Visits: 1
Hi there

The advent of OO databases has been a bit of a shammozel really, and to some degree the main architects (Microsoft, IBM, Oracle) have been guilty of not persuing the technoligies heavily enough. I have a OO DBMS book written some 8 years ago with very thorough mathmatical models and associated structures, so the thinking is certainly mature, but the process of interconnecting existing systems, providers, (the query engines - aka the human) is a different story that has struggled somewhat.

I wouldnt mind some articles on CACHE (OO DB supposedly), and others around. The life of OO and of course the movement into real "intelligence" in databases themselves and perhaps AI, is really dependent on an underling Hardware revolution; that (somehow) supports all the existing human and machine interactions we have grown up with.

Thanks for the article btw - ive probably gone off track myself Smile

Cheers

Ck



Chris Kempster
www.chriskempster.com
Author of "SQL Server 2k for the Oracle DBA"


Chris Kempster
www.chriskempster.com
Author of "SQL Server Backup, Recovery & Troubleshooting"
Author of "SQL Server 2k for the Oracle DBA"
K. Brian Kelley
K. Brian Kelley
Keeper of the Duck
Keeper of the Duck (7.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Points: 7506 Visits: 1917
FMS and DBMS are moving together. Oracle has already tried it. Microsoft is now doing so as well (note the date is 2002 on the following article):

http://news.com.com/2009-1017-857509.html

It's been talked about for awhile about Microsoft going to a SQL Server based file system. Longhorn may bring about that reality. More (from an article dated today Aug 4):

http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5058990.html?tag=fd_lede2_hed



K. Brian Kelley
http://www.truthsolutions.com/
Author: Start to Finish Guide to SQL Server Performance Monitoring
http://www.netimpress.com/


Edited by - bkelley on 08/04/2003 07:19:22 AM

K. Brian Kelley
@‌kbriankelley
Frank Kalis
Frank Kalis
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 6223 Visits: 289
Well, this is not a comment on the artcle.
But why do I see this as today's headline on the homepage when it is obviously from June?

Cheers,
Frank

--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/
ckempste
ckempste
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)Ten Centuries (1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1017 Visits: 1
Hi Brian

Good point actually, Oracle iFS (probably renamed) is an interesting piece of technology, especially the customisable render routines when sucking files in a out of the iFS repository. At the same time, its an expensive file system option, and standard doc management systems may be feeling the bite here (perhaps).

Interesting times.

Cheers

Ck

Chris Kempster
www.chriskempster.com
Author of "SQL Server 2k for the Oracle DBA"


Chris Kempster
www.chriskempster.com
Author of "SQL Server Backup, Recovery & Troubleshooting"
Author of "SQL Server 2k for the Oracle DBA"
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search