Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


100% Microsoft?


100% Microsoft?

Author
Message
bradmcgehee@hotmail.com
bradmcgehee@hotmail.com
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)SSC Veteran (216 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 216 Visits: 730
Comments posted to this topic are about the item 100% Microsoft?

Brad M. McGehee
DBA
SQLNightOwl
SQLNightOwl
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)SSC Veteran (243 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 243 Visits: 500
I have a hybrid approach. First, I look for an MS only solution. There's a tremendous number resources available thru SQL Server Central, other web sites and blogs that can answer many questions. We're fortunate to have such a rich ecosystem of experts, MVP's and other professionals that enjoy demonstrating their knowledge and helping fellow users.

After exhausting an MS only approach, I look into the tool vendors. Many of the tools available appear to consolidate build in features and make the existing features more accessible. I consider the reputation of the company and how their offering solves my need. I reach out to peers in the SQL community for their opinion on a specific product. I get unfiltered opinions about which products work and why.

I don't think I could do my job as easily without SQL Compare, SQL Data Compare, SQL Prompt and the refactor product. (shameless plug for Red-Gate). There are other tools I've used but won't mention because this shouldn't break into a diatribe of Product X is much better than Product Z.

I'm fortunate that if I can justify the tool then my boss is ready to make life easier for me. Having a supportive management structure is very welcome.

--Paul Hunter
tgolonka
tgolonka
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 5 Visits: 18
Brad,

The boss's objection was not to the possibility of data corruption, it was based on the expectation that introduction of a 3rd party into the relationship would give Microsoft all the excuse they need to relieve them of responsibility for support. Substitute IBM or Oracle for Microsoft and the song is the same.

Tom G
Alex Fekken
Alex Fekken
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)SSC Veteran (219 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 219 Visits: 460
Perhaps the first counter-question to aks would be: have you ever really needed Microsoft support for a tough problem? Did they actually contribute to a solution or did they simply take you by the hand and walk you through the obvious checks and possible fixes that you had already tried yourself? Did you sue them because the problem wasn't fixed and how did that go?

But regardless of that: what if Microsoft started selling, say, hard disks (like they sell mice and keyboards), would they be used to the exclusion of all others? What applies to software should apply to hardware as well, right? Because isn't hardware just as likely to contribute to data corruption, finger pointing and other issues as software, if not more so? So following the same line of argument one should us these Microsoft disks, regardless of how such disks might perform compared to others. And regardless of their price, capacity, life expectancy, suitability to be used in arrays etc. This example may not convince them (e.g. because Microsoft isn't selling hard disks yet), but it certainly shows the stupidity of the argument that 100% Microsoft is always better.

Alex
Frank Hamersley
Frank Hamersley
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)SSC Rookie (26 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 26 Visits: 110
I agree the existence of this management behaviour! However (IMO) the very holding of this belief is feeble in the extreme ... and is a clear marker for a manager who knows they couldn't organise a beer in a brewery.

Microsoft and most other major vendors don't care whether you have a mixed environment or not ... mostly <cynic> they just don't want to fix your "problems" unless obligated too (under a contractual obligation) or in their opinion (not yours) there might be brand damage if it is left un-addressed </cynic>. This is particularly the case now the security thing is sucking up most the discretionary oxygen vendors have to address customer use case problems.

I once worked in a shop who had a platinum support contract, were poster pin-up spruikers for the vendor and was suffering a nasty operational risk/loss in a flagship product offering ... that was comprehensively analysed and documented and presented to the vendor for a patch ... and still they skirted around accepting any responsibility. Net outcome was apologies to impacted customers and various band-aid patches to code to keep it within manageable levels. Very unbecoming in a professional sense!
IceDread
IceDread
Old Hand
Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)Old Hand (331 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 331 Visits: 1145
Nope, I'm not 100% microsoft.

Microsoft does not do 100% perfect solutions, their products comes with bugs. As can third party products do. Redgates prodcuts as a complement to ms products can for instance prove to be very handy and effective.
Jeffrey Irish
Jeffrey Irish
SSC-Enthusiastic
SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (163 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 163 Visits: 1122
Brad,

I will echo what others have said here, the conservative approach is going to trump many time saving solutions.

Having said that, I enjoy those solutions that add something to a product that I use. As an example, long before SQL 2008 came out and included "intellisense", RedGate had SQL Prompt. SQL Prompt made my life way easier and I became more productive. Not to mention all of the fantastic hints and code guides. SQL Prompt it still by far favored by me over the Microsoft solution.

We use other products as well, but just because they are not Microsoft provided solutions does not make them bad. Think about ways to consolidate usage reporting and such. There are scripts and reports and all of that sort of stuff that can be implemented, but why not buy something that offers the same capabilities? As long as it does not prove to drag performance down there is no harm.

Regards,

Irish w00t
TerryS
TerryS
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)SSC Eights! (956 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 956 Visits: 1425
I couldn't live without Idera's SQLsafe and Red Gate's SQL Compare and Data Compare. Does that answer the question? :-)



jay-h
jay-h
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)SSC Eights! (934 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 934 Visits: 2224
Back in the stone age (1980) there was a saying "no one ever lost their job for buying IBM". Basically it was a case of CYA even if it wasn't the best choice.

That is part of the problem here I believe. There is so much concern (not unjustified) that somone will pass the buck that people play it safe even at a cost in performance.

I admit that I've done some of the same. I overpaid for my home router from Verizon rather than putting in something else, so that when I have connection issues they can't fingerpoint somewhere else.

...

-- FORTRAN manual for Xerox Computers --
JChrisCompton
JChrisCompton
Old Hand
Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)Old Hand (380 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 380 Visits: 283
I wanted a data compare tool and a schema compare tool.
We never purchased because of 'business reasons'.

I'm very happy that VS 2010 has both of these, it has already made my life easier twice in the last few months since I've had it.
So, we are 100% MSFT, but we haven't had a choice.
There are some products out there, especially ones I have used before (like toad) that I'd love to give a try and buy.

If you wait long enough, MSFT will put what you need in their products - but I'm NOT saying we should have to wait :-D
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search