RE: Query difference: HOw to Avoiding UNION ALL with correlated Query

SSC Guru

Points: 186127

January 11, 2010 at 3:29 am

Bhuvnesh (1/11/2010)
sample data is not possible , as it includes amny tables
yes row count is correct and time taken = 18 secs
but my concerns is UNION ALL with same tables
i want to replace it with correlated query.

Bhuvnesh (1/11/2010)
yes . ur query is not returning any row

So...which is it?

^{“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw}

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden