From the title of this article, I was expecting much more on why I should be using the Full Recovery Model. Instead, I got an introduction to data loss and an introduction to backups. The author didn't introduce "SQL Server Recover Models" [sic] until near the end of the article, just before "Final Thoughts". Even then, this section was mostly links to BOL or extracts from it.

I'm not suggesting that this is a bad or misleading article. However, I would definitely change the title to something more appropriate.