• Jason Miller-476791 (9/17/2009)

    As far as Steve's idea of "deprecate that" function, I would love to see that.

    A backward approach could be made. All of the procedures we have here include insert statements into a logging table. I guess we could search for rows referencing items from sys.procedures and grab those objects not in the logging table. (Unfortunately, we only keep 45 days worth of data)

    Couldn't agree more with the need for housekeeping.

    I nominate Steve to open a connect item. I'd be very happy to vote for it as I think this is something that would very, very great to have in a future version.

    -Luke.

    To help us help you read this[/url]For better help with performance problems please read this[/url]