1. If I'm reading your results correctly - your index is only 233 pages big. So - while the table might be large - your index is apparently not.
2. I said that if it's below 1000, it would not DEfragment. Meaning - it will ALWAYS show as fragmented. The way the algorithm works (according to Paul again), it will figure out that there will be no benefit in defragmenting it, so it won't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?