I haven't used CLR or researched it much, but as far as DML goes, surely CLR triggers would fall under the same logic as a traditional DML trigger:
1. do [action] AFTER insert/update/delete
OR
2. do [action] INSTEAD OF insert/update/delete
The CLR bit as far as I can see is just an alternative to T-SQL. Where it appears in BOL is not necessarily an indication of correctness as far as this QoD goes, seeing as CLR triggers can be either DML or DDL. Perhaps BOL should state 'DML|DDL triggers can be written in either T-SQL or CLR'.
/Edit: must stop using gt/lt brackets, they get stripped out.
MARCUS. Why dost thou laugh? It fits not with this hour.
TITUS. Why, I have not another tear to shed;
--Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare