First, I am in agreement with Robert regarding the readability of this article. I would highly recommend running your next article by a proofer prior to posting.

Second, I don’t think that MS has ever (or ever will) refer to InfoPath as Access’s ‘counterpart’ – at least not in the sense of a replacement of Access. If you are using that word in the sense that it is a ‘compliment’ to Access, then I can buy that. See the article here (http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA011032471033.aspx) for a comparison of the two, and information regarding how to use Access as a data store for InfoPath.

With that said, I am intrigued by your suggestion that SQL Server can be used as a data store for InfoPath. Your article has prompted me to do a little more research into this area.