• Chris Cradock (7/24/2014)


    Data is never going to tell you what to do directly. For that you'd need an idea.

    Once you have the idea the next part is collecting the evidence to tell you its a good one.

    If you have several 'competing' ideas the evidence can then tell you which one is the best of the bunch.

    The problem with ideas is that they are going to impose a narrative on the data. If you are not careful you can impose a false narrative by collecting the wrong data, after data collection you also have the same problem in that a false narrative can be imposed by selective interpretation of the data.

    It can be the difference between:

    'Can we get data to prove X?' and 'What is this data telling us?'

    You said: 'Once you have the idea the next part is collecting the evidence to tell you its a good one.'

    Often you are better to look for data that will prove your idea is a bad one - try to challenge your hypothesis rather than support it.