• LightVader (9/10/2013)


    jeff.stanlick (9/10/2013)


    paul.knibbs (9/10/2013)


    Frankly, it seems to me that having the company which is selling the software also providing the certifications for that software is a conflict of interest which is never going to come out well. We need to have some sort of large, well-recognised third-party certification to get some trust back in the system, but I have no idea what the chances of *that* happening are.

    ^^ This right here. As long as there is a chance of unclear motivations in handing out those certifications, they'll never be fully trusted.

    I really like this idea. Having a third party running all tech certifications, not just Microsoft, sounds like a step in the right direction.

    krowley (9/10/2013)


    Maybe PASS or some other user organization should start offering some sort of certifications. Perhaps based on lab tests of some sort that could be peer graded by a group of people so we lower the amount of personal bias in grading.

    I think I could support this as well. It could be a good way to get it started.

    Maybe something like what has been outlined at http://jasonbrimhall.info/tag/stepping-stone/[/url]?

    Wayne
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
    Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes


    If you can't explain to another person how the code that you're copying from the internet works, then DON'T USE IT on a production system! After all, you will be the one supporting it!
    Links:
    For better assistance in answering your questions
    Performance Problems
    Common date/time routines
    Understanding and Using APPLY Part 1 & Part 2