No, it'll make it worse or no change at all.
Simple recovery - minimal logging, log truncated on checkpoint
Bulk-logged recovery - minimal logging, log truncated on log backup (if a full or diff backup has been taken since switching)
So why would you switch to bulk-logged and have the log be harder to reuse with no other gain?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability