@ Brian O'Leary

Please go back and read what I posted earlier in this thread and run the query I provided. I think I already showed where you may be mistaken.

The data collection query in the article always returns table names from the current database due to how the OBJECT_NAME function is used, and it always returns index names from the current database, but it can associate them with index usage stats for different indexes on different tables in different databases. The association (JOIN) is on object_id and index_id. If object_id and index_id match across databases (I have several cases of this occurring on a lightly loaded SQL Server instance) then the query returns very misleading rows. The names of the tables and indexes in the other databases are irrelevant because the query does not see them.

You have minimized (again) the inaccuracy of the data collection query in the article. Your "observations" are stated authoritatively, but I believe they are wrong.