Home Forums SQL Server 2005 Backups Create a policy to avoid backups withou copy_only option RE: Create a policy to avoid backups withou copy_only option

  • Wildcat (10/22/2010)


    If you issue a FULL backup C without COPY_ONLY between A and B, then, you break the previous log chain A to B.

    Right?

    Wrong.

    Full backups do not and never have broken the log chain.

    It's trivial to test and, if you want, I can find a blog post from the former program manager of the Storage Engine stating and proving this.

    The only things that break the log chain are:

    * Switch to simple recovery

    * Backup log with nolog/truncate only

    * Deleting a log backup (won't stop you taking log backups, will stop you recovering with them)

    According to Microsoft, you should backup log after the Full backup C to establish a new log chain.

    Link please.

    I need to write a scathing email to either the author or the MS documentation people if such an official recommendation exists

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass