February 27, 2018 at 3:30 pm
I've been performance tuning SQL servers for a few years as a DBA.
I'm trying to create a fast-food version of performance metrics that can quickly (in 5 minutes) and accurately (provable) answer a question from Management "Does this server need more/faster _ ?"
'_' being one of these 4 possible bottelenecks in an IT-stack bottom up (from server-perspective, without going in to the app/code/ui):
1. NETWORK
2. DISK
3. MEMORY
4. CPU
There are thousands of counters, articles, products to help monitor these. But is there a simple, instant and accurate script that can pinpoint if any of these 4 need to be scaled up or scaled out ?
e.g.
sys.dm_os_wait_stats - SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD has high signal waits => need either more or faster CPU.
PAGEIO_LATCH => need more files or faster DISK
Are these 2 accurate? Does Page Life Expectancy accurately 'PROVE' the need for more memory ? What is your **GO-TO** script for diagnosing a performance issue ?
I've used sp_whoisactive, sp_blitz, Glenn's DMVs, Spotlight, Idera etc. but am yet to come across a script that will satisfy a CIO's question about where to spend budget money, or that will correctly blame the problems on bad code, or slow SAN, or the ISP.
Everytime any (Network/Systems/DBA/App) engineer points fingers at the other team, we have to 'PROVE' our statement, and with Virtualization and Cloud, without ideal test environments, without downtime, it's getting increasingly difficult to *provably* pinpoint the source of server performance issues, other than maybe Task Manager <*excuse the rant*>
Viewing post 1 (of 1 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy