June 29, 2016 at 12:58 am
Apologies if this is the wrong forum. I found other licensing questions dotted about various threads. I noted that there was not one dedicated to licensing and I couldn't find one matching my question.
Ideally I'm looking for somebody who has actually experienced this from Microsoft or has some evidence from an audit to confirm this position.
There is a 4 node cluster (A-B-C-D) in site 1. All nodes are licensed.
We using async mirroring to provide DR to a 4 node cluster (E-F-G-H) to site 2.
In a failover from site 1 to site 2, we shutdown app the apps in site 1 i.e. no business is keyed.
We change to sync mirroring and flip the mirrors over so site 2 is active and return to async mirroring.
Is this a valid configuration? There is some confusion now about the "Free single passive" rule.
I see licensing working as follows.
Node A covering Node E
Node B covering Node F
Node C covering Node G
Node D covering Node H
We will never run on both sites simultaneously. However the challenge has been made that an instance on Node A can run on nodes B-H, so we need at least 7 licenses.
We have SA and I see the move from site 1 to site 2 part of license mobility rights.
We have been to a few LARS and a couple of other third parties and still not have clarity due to the complexity.
Any real world experience in this would be much appreciated.
Many Thanks
June 29, 2016 at 7:47 am
consult your Microsoft licensing contact for clarification
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply