Licensing - Clustering and Mirroring - Site availability and DR

  • Apologies if this is the wrong forum. I found other licensing questions dotted about various threads. I noted that there was not one dedicated to licensing and I couldn't find one matching my question.

    Ideally I'm looking for somebody who has actually experienced this from Microsoft or has some evidence from an audit to confirm this position.

    There is a 4 node cluster (A-B-C-D) in site 1. All nodes are licensed.

    We using async mirroring to provide DR to a 4 node cluster (E-F-G-H) to site 2.

    In a failover from site 1 to site 2, we shutdown app the apps in site 1 i.e. no business is keyed.

    We change to sync mirroring and flip the mirrors over so site 2 is active and return to async mirroring.

    Is this a valid configuration? There is some confusion now about the "Free single passive" rule.

    I see licensing working as follows.

    Node A covering Node E

    Node B covering Node F

    Node C covering Node G

    Node D covering Node H

    We will never run on both sites simultaneously. However the challenge has been made that an instance on Node A can run on nodes B-H, so we need at least 7 licenses.

    We have SA and I see the move from site 1 to site 2 part of license mobility rights.

    We have been to a few LARS and a couple of other third parties and still not have clarity due to the complexity.

    Any real world experience in this would be much appreciated.

    Many Thanks

  • consult your Microsoft licensing contact for clarification

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply