November 6, 2006 at 9:03 am
November 6, 2006 at 9:29 am
I would assume 25% and 50% more rows... but the performance could still be very tolerable even with 200 M rows. Depends on the server, the queries and the load you put on it. You'll have to do load testing on a test server with the exact same specs to get that answer. We can't just guess at this one...
November 9, 2006 at 3:09 am
Thanks for the quick response. I guess you are quite accurate.
November 9, 2006 at 6:27 am
Ya and judging by the lack of responses from other DBAS, I think it's right on the money.
If you even encounter problems with performances on that table or any other. Just post back and we'll help you get through it.
God speed!
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply