August 26, 2008 at 5:48 pm
I have encountered a problem for which I find no references.
One particular application our firm runs will develop a blocking transaction. This is not unusual in itself but this particular blocking transaction is always identified as transaction number "-2." It, of course does not display in the list of transactions in Activity Monitor nor in a list generated by sp_who2. But, when this transaction appears, it blocks anything that follows it and it cannot be "killed." The only way to clear this transaction is to stop and restart SQL Server.
How often does this problem occur? Well, it has only happened twice in 18 months of running this application but it has happened on different servers. The explanation of a "ghost transaction" doing the blocking is met with glances suggesting incompetence. ;=}
Have any of you encountered this problem before? Any suggestions?
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin
August 27, 2008 at 1:20 am
Spid's with an ID of -2 or orphaned sessions and you need to clean them up manually.
Unfortunately you can't kill them the easy way by running Kill -2 ,but you need to find the Unit of Work ID from the syslockinfo table. You can find more info here http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa275788(SQL.80).aspx and here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa933230(SQL.80).aspx
[font="Verdana"]Markus Bohse[/font]
August 27, 2008 at 1:48 am
To expand a bit, they are orphaned distributed transactions. What happens is that some app uses DTC in it's communications with SQL and then doesn't properly commit or rollback the distributed transaction. I've seen it a fair bit with apps using JDBC.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
August 27, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Thanks Gail, the only app we have causing this problem is a Java app that relies heavily on DTC. Fortunately, the problem only seems to arise when we are in a testing phase (either post-migration or qualifying testing in QA) but you have provided a great clue.
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin
August 27, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Thanks Markus, those page links were really helpful.
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply