Questions about DBCC TRACEON

  • How much extra load does setting trace flags cause? Does it depend on the flag? Has anyone found any of these useful? Has anyone had problems with any of these?

    Robert Marda

    Robert W. Marda
    Billing and OSS Specialist - SQL Programmer
    MCL Systems

  • Haven't seen anything on these. They must have overhead to process and send the data, but no idea how much.

    Steve Jones

    steve@dkranch.net

  • I sometimes use the ones for deadlocks, thats about it though. Agree with Steve that they must add some overhead.

    Andy

  • Those are the ones that prompted this question. I am specifically considering using DBCC TRACEON(3605) and DBCC TRACEON(1204). Are these the ones you use?

    Robert Marda

    Robert W. Marda
    Billing and OSS Specialist - SQL Programmer
    MCL Systems

  • I didn't notice any major change when I added the one for deadlock and lock extended details. There is some overhead, and the best way I can tell you is to set up Performance Log and take a snapshot of memory, cpu and drive before and after the trace is turned on.

  • I typically use 1204.

    Andy

  • Thank you all for your responses. I'm going to try using them soon as we are getting enough deadlocks that it would be nice to know more about what is happening.

    Robert Marda

    Robert W. Marda
    Billing and OSS Specialist - SQL Programmer
    MCL Systems

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply