SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 

Anonymisation Confusion

By Steve Jones,

The GDPR starts getting enforced in a few weeks. It's been law for a couple years, but the authorities have given companies time to comply. I know various entities are frantically working towards compliance as I keep getting updates to Terms of Service. My company is among them, and we are diligently ensuring we can prove that we aren't violating any rules. That's good because I'm sure fines will reduce any bonus we might earn this year.

As I've been reading over the law and talking with customers, I've learned quite a bit. Redgate Software builds products to help with compliance and we're updating guidance and information on how to work with data. As I've helped to update information and explain concepts I keep running into the term "pseudonymisation". If you listen to the podcast, you'll probably hear me struggle to pronounce it, but more importantly, I was initially confused about what this actually meant.

The Data Protection site from Ireland has a great description of how this differs from anonymisation. You can read through the document, but anonymisation means that the data can't be some how reverse engineered to find the original data. In terms of privacy, an anonymised set of my data wouldn't allow anyone to determine the data is about me.

If the data is pseudonumised, data about me would be replaces with a token, but there might be other means of discovering a data set is about me. As an example, in an eCommerce system, you might have an order key in a dev data set that's copied directly from production. However, my name would be replaced with something else, like Bob Smith. It's not apparent that it's my data, but the protection is limited. If the data were anonymised, the order key would be replaced as well to prevent reverse engineering.

Many of us have gotten used to being lax with dev and test data, often just restoring from production. It's handy, convenient, and allows you to find problems in production or verify changes using known values. The downside of this is that we have poor data security. There are no shortage of data breaches from dev and test systems. Certainly plenty of data has been lost from developer laptops as well. Even if you had your laptop encrypted, there's no real excuse for using real data in less secure environments. 

We need to learn to use anonymised data, and become comfortable with the idea of working on secure data sets. That also means we need the skills to ensure we build good, useful, valid datasets with production-like characteristics.

 
Total article views: 62 | Views in the last 30 days: 1
 
Related Articles
FORUM

Anonymisation Confusion

Comments posted to this topic are about the item [B]Anonymisation Confusion[/B] Thaks to big data, t...

FORUM

Replace

How to replace a value

ARTICLE

Productive Meetings

It seems that many meetings in corporate settings are wastes of times. Can they be better? Steve Jon...

FORUM

ISQLW Replacement

2005/8 deleted ISQLW.EXE small footprint utility with no real replacement

BLOG

Are you a DBA? You might Be!

 Are you a DBA? You might Be! On Twitter, people do a lot more than gossip and post messages about ...

Tags
editorial    
 
Contribute