stevefromOZ (9/13/2010)

---

can i take back my article rating somehow?

SanjayAttray (9/13/2010)

---

Steve, it's a pure form of plagiarism. But, why take the rating out for article. It's a well written article. Perfect reading to start Monday morning.

r5d4 (9/13/2010)

---

The article has served to remind me to re-read the original.

I do hope Omeswar is not going to get paid for his Copy and Paste technique.

Trevor R Udden (9/13/2010)

---

Odanwada -

Did I miss a major citiation at the end of your article? You might want to try not blantly plagirizing others work. The article you claim as yours was originally written by Thomas Kejser and Denny Lee, members of the SQL Customer Advisory Team, and published in 2008.

Here is a link to the original article, and a wiki link to plagiarism, in case you are un familiar with its meaning.

http://sqlcat.com/top10lists/archive/2008/10/01/top-10-sql-server-integration-services-best-practices.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

amenjonathan (9/13/2010)

---

I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)

Just wow!

Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors!

amenjonathan (9/13/2010)

---

I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)

Just wow!

Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors!