Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12345»»»

The Easy Poll Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:02 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:24 AM
Points: 33,088, Visits: 15,197
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Easy Poll






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #450304
Posted Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:34 PM


SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:56 PM
Points: 129, Visits: 183
I want SP5 for SQL Server 2000. (Dont care about SQL 2005. I am waiting for SQL 2008, although already legal on 2005)

5ilverFox
Namakwa Sands
South Africa
Post #450310
Posted Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:30 PM


SSC-Forever

SSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-Forever

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:58 PM
Points: 42,466, Visits: 35,532
Give me SP3!

We're currently pushing to get the 5th cumulative update on one of our servers (cause we keep running into a problem that was fixed in SP2 and fixed again in a patch that made it into CU 4)

We're running into reluctance because 'It's not a service pack. We should wait for the next service pack'. Meanwhile I'm flushing out the token cache every 3 hours...

SP5 for 2000, not so much. All my remaining SQL 2000 servers are vendor apps. If they don't say we can patch/upgrade, we're not allowed to. They haven't allowed an upgrade to SQL 2005, so I doubt they'll test a SP5.



Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Post #450326
Posted Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:48 PM
SSC Journeyman

SSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC Journeyman

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, July 3, 2011 4:07 PM
Points: 98, Visits: 87
I think the interesting question is: what do you want in SQL2K5 SP3?
Post #450329
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 1:21 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500

Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:18 AM
Points: 559, Visits: 1,159
Absolutely, definitly, no question we want SP for both and regular SP for supported products.
Post #450348
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 1:24 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, July 21, 2014 4:57 AM
Points: 1,049, Visits: 3,002
My answer's rather more basic. I want my SQL servers to be reasonably bug-free and secure. I'm not too concerned about how that's achieved. If Microsoft wanted to rebadge their last cumulative update as "Service Pack 3", I wouldn't be any the wiser, but would be just as happy. As long as I have the mechanisms I need AND those mechanisms are reasonably easy to administer, that'll do it for me.

Semper in excretia, sumus solum profundum variat
Post #450350
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 1:54 AM
SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:16 AM
Points: 295, Visits: 1,011
My answere to the big Q is of courses YES I want an SP3.
Post #450359
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 3:41 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:14 PM
Points: 139, Visits: 247
As a developer I want a stable platform to work off.

Most MS customers don't necessarily understand what goes in to a service pack or update - especially those that outsource IT/small number of staff etc, but to me having a more rigorously tested app with a complete roll up of all issues to date X is a plus.

We generally don't go to the next product unless SP1 is out and tested. I went Vista on Feb 1 2007 and am still getting bitten by issues...so can't develop from that machine yet! Do I hear an XP service pack anyone?

2000 SP5? Yes - only 10% of our customers are on anything else. Why change your workhorse when it still gives you what you need?

2005 SP3? Thats a given surely!
Post #450381
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 3:49 AM


SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:40 AM
Points: 7,001, Visits: 8,439
Oh certainly a huge yes regarding SP-release

Why, because IMHO a SP is considered to be a stable release, tested well by the manufacturer. Certainly worth a general test and go.

A cumulative update is just a new package of hotfixes, designed for certain issues, so IMO not _that_ stable for us (systems managers) to give it a general test and go.

Also with CUs the frequency is to high to set up a release cycle every time.

After all, we have to determine which version of the software we will install by default when a new instance is being asked for.
For now that is set to SQL2005 SP2 + CU4.
But the active production instances are not yet being upgraded with CU4. (they are still on CU2)



Johan


Don't drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground won't get you anywhere

- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data/code to get the best help


- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt ?


"press F1 for solution", "press shift+F1 for urgent solution"


Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
Post #450384
Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 4:42 AM


UDP Broadcaster

UDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP Broadcaster

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, July 21, 2014 8:43 AM
Points: 1,434, Visits: 721
I'd agree with Alzdba.

We're rolling out SQL 2005 at the moment mainly it's had 2 service packs and for me this is an indicator that the manufacturer's put some effort into ensuring that all those initial bugs have been ironed out. I haven't bothered with the cumulative updates so far because I'm a bit nervous about applying something that comes with a disclaimer saying:

"This cumulative update package may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by any of these problems, we recommend that you wait for the next SQL Server 2005 service pack that contains the hotfixes in this cumulative update package"

So yeah - I'd like SP3 - please.
Post #450393
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12345»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse