Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 


 
     
Recent Posts
   
Popular Topics
Home   
Search
    Members    Calendar    Who's On

Home » SQLServerCentral.com » Editorials » SharePoint - Subversive?
Add to briefcase
30 posts, Page 1 of 3
123»»»

SharePoint - Subversive? Expand / Collapse
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Bill Nicolich
Posted Sunday, January 01, 2012 10:53 PM


SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:17 PM
Points: 111, Visits: 534
Comments posted to this topic are about the item SharePoint - Subversive?

Bill Nicolich: www.SQLFave.com.
Daily tweet of what's new and interesting: AppendNow
Post #1228768
vmit02
Posted Sunday, January 01, 2012 10:55 PM
Mr or Mrs. 500

Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:07 PM
Points: 539, Visits: 41
You are totally correct that management don't want to hear. Yes I suspect they think they are the only ones with ideas that can make a difference.
Post #1228769
tnpich
Posted Monday, January 02, 2012 7:47 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 14, 2012 8:09 AM
Points: 7, Visits: 29
I don't know if its just management. There are a lot of factors:
I've seen where senior management has said lets try collaboration and then the idea dies because no one else wants to go through the effort of learning the new way of doing things.
Middle managers don't want to, or won't, assign resources to reconfigure SharePoint, or other tools, to be truly collaborative.
I've also seen where team members say that want to use collaborative tools but then don't share data/knowledge because then they are no longer the heroes that people go to get information/reports.
I've also experienced team members (being too lazy?) to read posted documents because it's just easier to ask the SME about a topic rather than read it on a collaborative site.
Post #1228915
Doctor Who 2
Posted Monday, January 02, 2012 9:22 AM


SSC Journeyman

SSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC Journeyman

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:20 PM
Points: 97, Visits: 235
This is a very good topic, I think, because we're facing this situation now. I've been at my current location for a very long time. When I started there we set up a shared folder on a Windows server where we put everything. Back in the day, that worked out well, everyone could find documentation and it was great. However, that was well over 10 years ago, and as time has passed new people that have come on board just don't get the idea of going to this shared folder to look for documentation; and this includes new developers who've been hired the last 5 years. (I don't get why looking on a shared folder is so hard to understand, but believe me, it appears to me true.) But also, as time has gone by different documents have gone into different sub-folders, etc. I think it's become something of a mess.

So I've been thinking very seriously of SharePoint, at least at this point as a document repository. I'm very interestd to see how this discussion works out, because I'd like to see how it's worked for other people.


Rod
Post #1228931
Revenant
Posted Monday, January 02, 2012 10:22 AM


Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:46 AM
Points: 3,448, Visits: 2,522
The problem I have repeatedly experienced is that SharePoint adds one more place to maintain. For me the place where I/we keep all and most of the documentation is TFS. We keep track of user stories, deliverables and bugs. We are learning to use Test Manager, although we now slowed down because we are waiting for 2012 which will do some of the things differently.

Then there is e-mail. People keep e-mails with pieces of important information, but not everyone was on TO or CC. So if the question pops up again later, someone has to find the old message and forward it to the newbie.

So SharePoint just adds a third method of documentation storage. I would use its wikies, not the storage of Office documents.
Post #1228951
Ramona-1042522
Posted Monday, January 02, 2012 1:57 PM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:52 PM
Points: 40, Visits: 216
Your article hits on a key reason why organizations adopt SharePoint to begin with; to pass on experiential knowledge of an organization, and also why that objective is often not realized. For SharePoint to be an effective vehicle to allow senior team members' insights to reach the rest of the group they have to be made a focal point rather than, as other posters noted, buried in a document store. Two very effective tools to accomplish this are the virtual meeting space and metadata tagging. Meetings should target a chunk of information that is narrow enough to be consumable by team members who are already occupied with their own workflow, and be supported by accurate tagging that will lead them straight to documents relevant to the meeting topic when they need reinforcement. It may not be that a great volume of unorganized content obscures information, rather than managers selectively withholding. SharePoint can be a great tool to sort that out if it's wielded effectively.
Ramona Maxwell MCPD SharePoint 2010 @sqlsolver
Post #1228985
Charles Tsang
Posted Tuesday, January 03, 2012 2:53 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, January 25, 2013 4:49 AM
Points: 6, Visits: 264
I went to some of the first Sharepoint implementation tutorials at Microsoft campus in Reading UK when it launched. They had some really good ideas for getting people out of the "shared folder" to the Sharepoint repository.
The main thing was doing a search index on the shared folder so that people searching in Sharepoint found the stuff that was still in the "shared folder".
The other bit to the main thing was making the shared folder read only!

I think however that the main reason Sharepoint hasn't taken off is that it is a responsibility much like any website content and it needs to be managed. It's difficult enough getting a company to find someone to look after it's main website content, now with Sharepoint, it's possible for each department to have it's own little web portal....
Post #1229103
tfell
Posted Tuesday, January 03, 2012 3:00 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:47 AM
Points: 2, Visits: 2
I think most 'techies' tend to want to concentrate on the problem in hand rather than be constantly disturbed by constant 'collaboration', then when they need input would probably go to a community forum where many 'large-brains' with the skills needed to answer the problem will contribute advice. Even in large corporations, there often isn't a huge wealth of relevant skills as the company will be relying on a relatively small collection of specialist individuals to provide the overall skill coverage they need.
The best exceptions will probably be found in organisations lik Microsoft and IBM where the internal community is vast and experienced.
Post #1229106
brosspaxedi
Posted Tuesday, January 03, 2012 11:30 AM


Valued Member

Valued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued Member

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:41 PM
Points: 67, Visits: 212
Some thoughts (which may or may not be half baked, as my knowledge and experience with SP is limited)...

* Isn't storage of documents inside of Sql Server more expensive than on disk?
* Isn't document sharing about the least $$$ profitable reason to implement SharePoint? How does that provide a return on investment?
* Since Search can now catalog files on disk, and with full text searching, why bother "cataloging" manually by providing tags and the like?
* Some reasons you might want to bring docs into SP might be SOX, HIPAA and other secure access issues.
* SP requires an expensive person to configure and maintain, so you need some $$$ impetus ore a need to satisfy a requirement.
* The best stuff is only in Enterprise, (ie: PerformancePoint dashboards), and that costs a lot more, so you need to be sure you can't service your stratgic decision maker(s) any other way just as well. SSRS can provide report subscriptions, for example.
* If indeed, SP is the future, *which I think it is*, since it is web based, then it is useless to resist the Borg. But like the Cloud, when must you surrender? Maybe not for three years.
* Organizational tools are wasted on people with no knack for creating effective teams to begin with.

*******************
What I lack in youth, I make up for in immaturity!
Post #1229470
Revenant
Posted Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:39 PM


Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:46 AM
Points: 3,448, Visits: 2,522
brosspremier (1/3/2012)
Some thoughts (which may or may not be half baked, as my knowledge and experience with SP is limited)...

* Isn't storage of documents inside of Sql Server more expensive than on disk?

With 4 TB disk drives expected to dip under $200 once the Thai plants are fully back, space is usually a non-issue.

* Isn't document sharing about the least $$$ profitable reason to implement SharePoint? How does that provide a return on investment?

In my experience, document sharing itself does not. It is when you also implement workflows and use reconciliation of concurrent edits that SP starts showing its strengths.

* Since Search can now catalog files on disk, and with full text searching, why bother "cataloging" manually by providing tags and the like?

You can indeed use automated indexing. That, however, assumes that all users adhere to a strict discipline and all documents have mandatory headers that contain all information needed for indexing.

* Some reasons you might want to bring docs into SP might be SOX, HIPAA and other secure access issues.
* SP requires an expensive person to configure and maintain, so you need some $$$ impetus ore a need to satisfy a requirement.

True. However, your SP admin will likely double as a TFS admin, because TFS is just a specialized SP, so the skills are transferable.

* The best stuff is only in Enterprise, (ie: PerformancePoint dashboards), and that costs a lot more, so you need to be sure you can't service your strat[e]gic decision maker(s) any other way just as well. SSRS can provide report subscriptions, for example.

If you look only on IT operations (including development), TFS provides much better management reports.


* If indeed, SP is the future, *which I think it is*, since it is web based, then it is useless to resist the Borg. But like the Cloud, when must you surrender? Maybe not for three years.
* Organizational tools are wasted on people with no knack for creating effective teams to begin with.

Absolutely.

I have been using both TFS and SP for several years. Personally, I prefer TFS and I asked for better document handling in TFS, which would make SP redundant.
Post #1229518
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase
30 posts, Page 1 of 3
123»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse

 
 
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use. Report Abuse.