Democratizing the Microsoft MVP Award

SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.

Popular Topics

Home

Members

Calendar

Who's On

Home » SQLServerCentral.com » Editorials » Democratizing the Microsoft MVP Award

46 posts, Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 »»»

Democratizing the Microsoft MVP Award

Rate Topic

Display Mode

Topic Options

Author

Message

Tony Davis

Posted Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:15 PM

Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 9:24 AM
Points: 511, Visits: 948

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Democratizing the Microsoft MVP Award

Post #861174

Liz Laurents

Posted Saturday, February 06, 2010 3:18 PM

Grasshopper

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:53 PM
Points: 10, Visits: 12

great idea to "democratize" the MVP process ... and then you want to restrict voting to people with MSDN subscriptions? what are you guys thinking?

Post #861200

Jeff Moden

Posted Saturday, February 06, 2010 7:13 PM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:35 PM
Points: 33,107, Visits: 27,027

Heh... you beat me to it, Liz. I was thinking that very same thing.

--Jeff Moden

"RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".

First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."

For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/

For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/

Post #861236

Jeff Moden

Posted Saturday, February 06, 2010 7:19 PM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:35 PM
Points: 33,107, Visits: 27,027

Voting by the general public smacks of a popularity contest rather than a public service award (which is what being an MVP is really all about). If you really want to turn it into a democratic process, then start up an SQLServerCentral.com MVP award or a PASS MVP award.

--Jeff Moden

Post #861240

GilaMonster

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 2:50 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:37 PM
Points: 38,028, Visits: 30,334

I would rather not see a list of requirements, weightings or things like that. Having such a list being known makes it possible for people to 'game' the award. For people to blog/answer forum questions/write articles/etc not because they want to help out the community, but because they are checking off items on a requirements list.

As for weightings, imagine what would happen if someone stated that posts on the MSDN forums are weighted 3 times what posts on any other forum are?

There will always be people complaining that they deserve the award and weren't awarded, that someone was awarded and didn't deserve it, etc. It's human nature. There is no change that they can make that will make everyone happy. Is it perfect as-is? No, definitely not. I got a good example of that Jan this year. Does it work well enough? Well, I suppose that depends who you ask.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Post #861278

GilaMonster

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 2:59 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:37 PM
Points: 38,028, Visits: 30,334

Jeff Moden (2/6/2010)

Voting by the general public smacks of a popularity contest rather than a public service award (which is what being an MVP is really all about).

Agreed. While many MVPs are popular, it shouldn't go the other way around. I know some MVPs that work tirelessly in the local community, but if I mentioned names I doubt anyone here would have heard of them. Doesn't make them any less deserving.

In addition, complaining that the Microsoft MVP award is administered and judged by Microsoft employees is just a little odd.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Post #861279

Andy Leonard

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 11:05 AM

Old Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:27 PM
Points: 375, Visits: 950

Interesting thoughts Tony!

Recently, MVP nominations were opened to the public. Anyone can now nominate someone for MVP at the public MVP site - you can even nominate yourself.

:{> Andy

Andy Leonard
CSO, Linchpin People
Follow me on Twitter: @AndyLeonard

Post #861338

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 11:40 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 5:37 PM
Points: 31,521, Visits: 13,855

Andy Leonard (2/7/2010)

Interesting thoughts Tony!

Recently, MVP nominations were opened to the public. Anyone can now nominate someone for MVP at the public MVP site - you can even nominate yourself.

:{> Andy

Actually they've been open for a few years. There just wasn't an "easy" process to do it. I nominated a few people in 2006/2007, before I had the award.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help

Post #861352

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 11:45 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 5:37 PM
Points: 31,521, Visits: 13,855

I've debated this with people a few times and I tend to agree with Gail. Publishing a set of criteria (xx forum posts, yy blogs, zzz speaking engagements, etc) would lead a lot of people to "game" the award. As it is, I see some people that make an effort to earn the award with a year of hard work.

I think there's nothing wrong with that as the MVP is a yearly award, given for your community service over the last year. In practice that's hard to rank, and I think that overall the people running the award do an OK job. What's very interesting is that a few of my MVP admins from MS haven't been SQL people. So they don't necessarily judge my technical expertise, at least not themselves. They may get help, or may not (which might be good for me :) ).

This is a Microsoft award, and I think they handle it pretty well. They get some community support and advocation for their products, those that do the work get some rewards from MS, but it's loosely coupled. You don't have to continue to provide support or work for MS, and they don't agree to give to xxx as an MVP. The awards change at a whim.

The one thing that I've heard suggested, which would be interesting, is that maybe we ought to limit the number of MVP awards you get. Either consecutively or in total, allowing more people to participate in the program. There are a lot of very qualified, very talented people that don't make the cut, sometimes because there are just some others that do more.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help

Post #861354

sqlvogel

Posted Sunday, February 07, 2010 1:00 PM

SSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:15 PM
Points: 407, Visits: 2,865

I was a SQL Server MVP for 5 years, 2004-2008.

I think that "democratizing" MVP selection online would devalue the programme. Online elections are too fickle and open to influences that have nothing to do with the quality and consistency of contributions that the award is supposed to represent. The knowledge level of those seeking help in many online communities today is often very low indeed - surely much lower than 5 or 10 years ago. Smart people know how to find the answers without asking: they Google or read a book; they don't post. Put bluntly, I wouldn't trust most online communities to choose who is expert and who isn't. I don't believe Microsoft would either.

Also, not all MVPs are awarded primarily for their online contributions. MVPs who organise user groups and conferences would probably be at a disadvantage if voting online was a criterion for selection.

The MVP is Microsoft's award. They invest considerable time and money in the programme as a way of engaging with community influencers, getting feedback and refining plans for future product development. If it became a community beauty contest then I suspect it would be less valuable to them and their support for it would wane.

David

Post #861365

« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

46 posts, Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 »»»

Permissions