Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase «««1234

Maximum instances supported by SQL Server 2008 Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:30 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500

Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:04 AM
Points: 558, Visits: 1,454
Well I'm confused. I'm currently studying for my MCTS in SQL Server 2008 and all the literature I have found up to this point suggests that instance support is 50 in Enterprise Edition and 16 in Standard Edition. This is cited by "The Real MCTS SQL Server 2008" study guide by Syngress and also the following link. Can someone please clarify as I wan't to be sure I know the correct answer for the exam!

http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.asp

Many thanks
Post #723121
Posted Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:54 PM
Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:37 AM
Points: 313, Visits: 128
50 and 16 are correct, as is very clearly stated on this link http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx . The 50/50 referenced in the MSDN link is for the maximums for SQL Server 2008 for 32 bit and 64 bit, no mention of which edition.

Here is the title row of that table:
"SQL Server Database Engine object" "Maximum sizes/numbers SQL Server (32-bit)" "Maximum sizes/numbers SQL Server (64-bit)"

Unfortunately the system told me I was wrong so I don't get the point for the correct answer, but I believe I get one for a post. So I guess it evens out...sort of.

Alvin Ramard (5/18/2009)
zzx375 (5/18/2009)
Perhaps I am confused or simply don't understand the question or have a bad reference source.

The whitepaper "SQL Server Consolidation with SQL Server 2008"
Writer: Martin Ellis
Reviewer: Prem Mehra,Lindsey Allen, Tiffany Wissner, Sambit Samal

Published: March 2009
Applies to: SQL Server 2008

page ten, lists

Edition Maximum instances
SQL Server 2008 Standard 16*
SQL Server 2008 Enterprise 50*
*Depending upon available system resources and workload


Check out the link below. It's the one referenced in the answer. It states both Enterprise and Standard can handle 50.

[url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx][/url]
Post #725609
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 4:36 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 7:44 AM
Points: 178, Visits: 513
...ehh, irrelevant... :)
Post #725697
Posted Monday, June 08, 2009 5:14 PM
SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:07 PM
Points: 227, Visits: 192
hi,

I agree with the 50 instances for Enterprise and 16 for standard based on the following link that I read on MSDN>

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645993.aspx

Can somebody tell me the difference between Multi-instance support and Max no of instances. Its kinda confusing :)

Thanks


Razi, M.
http://questivity.com/it-training.html
Post #731033
Posted Sunday, March 21, 2010 4:09 PM


SSCrazy Eights

SSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy Eights

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:37 AM
Points: 8,287, Visits: 8,738
This is an awful mess, isn't it? Should it be 50 and 16 or 50 and 50?

Well, actually, no: it depends whether the platform the instances are to be installed on is a standalone server or a failover cluster. The only answer option that says it depends on anything is the fourth and that says "depends on the OS" which is of course wrong, but it seemed to me to be less wrong than any of the others.

Did the 50 50 or 50 16 question ever get resolved? Has the MS documentation been rendered consistent?
And, of course, should everyone have been talking about whether it's 50 50 or 25 25 depending or 50 16 or 16 16 depending?


Tom
Post #887115
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase «««1234

Permissions Expand / Collapse