|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:51 PM
Points: 161,
Visits: 301
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:51 PM
Points: 161,
Visits: 301
|
|
I know there are plenty of things that I didn't mention in the article. The plan was to help persuade people who are still using the SQL2K tools to consider switching.
Rob Farley LobsterPot Solutions & Adelaide SQL Server User Group Company: http://www.lobsterpot.com.au Blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rob_farley
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:10 PM
Points: 135,
Visits: 205
|
|
It's still not as good as TOAD or TOra for Oracle, but it's loads better than Enterprise Mgr. One thing that seems to be missing, though... if you do any data manipulation directly on a table, it doesn't seem to commit your changes nor provide an obvious way to do so, but maybe I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:03 AM
Points: 33,
Visits: 759
|
|
Thanks for the article. I love Management Studio and use it with SQL 2000 extensively. The text and file searching is great. I think my favorite feature is the ability to design views with case statements that show in the table design window. EM would not render complicated views, especially ones with case statements. So what's not to like. It is definitely more of a memory hog, which comes with the extra bells and whistles. I still prefer Query Analyzer for lean, mean object viewing and SQL coding. I miss seeing the execution time for views in the bottom status bar (QA). I also miss the ability to create a drop and create (QA). Currently, this is a two step process (UGHHHH). I appreciate the SourceSafe integration, but it has been a little tedious to use. Not as simple as right-click and check in unless you setup a database integration project. And there's not much documentation on this subject. If someone has good experience in this area, can you please write an article for us. Microsoft is fairly consistent with bringing out a product redesign and scrapping some of the better (and I guess, lesser known) features. Can someone please buy them some Requirements Management software?
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:56 PM
Points: 52,
Visits: 265
|
|
I agree Management Studio is a step in the right direction. Let's hope it's more stable than EM. A couple things I wish they would have carried over from EM: OBJECT SEARCH What a handy tool. Why on Earth would they drop this? Sure, you can use the INFORMATION_SCHEMA views, but it was nice not to have to crank out a new select statement each time I want to find all the occurrences of "InvoiceNumber" in a db. Also gone is the ability to copy a table from EM, paste it into QA and have the Create Table statement done for you. Not the end of the world, but it was handy. Maybe they will add these back in one day?
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:06 PM
Points: 111,
Visits: 59
|
|
I agree that Management Studio gives more interactive features than EM. But....
What would be the option for a Visual Studio 1.x developer with ASP.NET projects, to use SQL 2005 and its Management Studio (or even SQL 2000 with Management Studio) to avoid .Net framework 1.x and 2.0 problems...?
Is there any way to avoid installation of .Net Framework 2.0 to use at least Management Studio (even without SQL 2005)..?
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:51 PM
Points: 161,
Visits: 301
|
|
You shouldn't have any problems with SQL2005 and VS1.x. I still use VS2003 for quite a few projects, and I've never had any conflicts between .Net 1.1 and 2.0.
Rob Farley LobsterPot Solutions & Adelaide SQL Server User Group Company: http://www.lobsterpot.com.au Blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/rob_farley
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, September 07, 2007 1:13 AM
Points: 30,
Visits: 1
|
|
Maybe it's just me but I find the combination of the issues below make it unusable. I have reverted back to SQL2k QA after several thwarted attempts to use Man Studio successfully. (I am a database developer using SQL 2000) You can't change the default scripting options as mentioned earlier in this thread. QA had the ability to switch on and off DROP object scripts and permissions scripts when you script a CREATE object. Man Studio won't let you change any options for scripting a single object (from the object browser tree) as far as I can see. I also don't want the USE statement for every object that I script but you can't turn this off either. I find myself continually cutting and pasting just to get what you could easily tailor in QA. The text editor is now like VS but for me this is just a further annoyance. If you press Shift + Home QA (and pretty much every other text editor that I've used) will highlight the whole of the current line. Man Studio "cleverly" highlights from the first character. Whereas this is useful in VS when there is a lot of indenting it has little or no value (for me) in writing T-SQL. If anyone knows how to change this behaviour I'll more than grateful if you can point me in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:02 AM
Points: 530,
Visits: 945
|
|
| One thing Management Studio can't do is edit table-valued functions from SS2000 databases. I have to go back to EM for that.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:03 AM
Points: 33,
Visits: 759
|
|
>> A couple things I wish they would have carried over from EM: >> OBJECT SEARCH The only replacement I have found equivalent to the Object Search in EM is by using the filters in the Object Explorer window; however, this is fairly anemic compared with the original object search. I have not found a way to extend the properties in the Filter Settings, as you only can filter on Name, Schema, or Creation Date. The dialog does not appear very extensible, as the property settings are bundled into the ObjectExplorer.dll, so this would be another request to dear Microsoft. It would be nice to filter on date modified to see your recent changes, etc. Also, while we're still griping a little, I do miss QA's ability to start the server when connecting to a new database. Not a production thing, just more of a development issue because I maintain so many different copies of SQL Servers on my machine, that I do not start them all by default. I find myself jumping back to SQL2K Service Manager to start the database engines, which at least it can crank up 2005 db's.
|
|
|
|