|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 10:29 PM
Points: 2,178,
Visits: 3,599
|
|
Comments posted to this topic are about the item sys.objects
Mohammed Moinudheen
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:18 AM
Points: 1,996,
Visits: 1,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy Eights
        
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:30 AM
Points: 9,410,
Visits: 6,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:59 PM
Points: 1,354,
Visits: 1,299
|
|
| An easy question and I cannot believe I missed it. I answered too quickly without thinking about the other possibilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:12 AM
Points: 1,167,
Visits: 646
|
|
| Thanks for the easy point today.
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:01 AM
Points: 1,232,
Visits: 1,046
|
|
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.
|
|
|
|
|
SSChasing Mays
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:57 AM
Points: 659,
Visits: 465
|
|
| Nice and easy start for the day..
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:59 PM
Points: 1,354,
Visits: 1,299
|
|
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.  Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:01 AM
Points: 1,232,
Visits: 1,046
|
|
cengland0 (1/25/2011)
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer.  Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong. Here is a quick of the history of sysobjects or sys.objects on the differant server versions.
SQL 2000 - dbo.sysobjects was a System table. Contains one row for each object (constraint, default, log, rule, stored procedure, and so on) created within a database. In tempdb only, this table includes a row for each temporary object. Some did call it the base system table since it was the first object listed. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa260447(SQL.80).aspx
SQL 2005 - sys.objects system view was created as part of the object catalog. dbo.sysobjects and sys.sysobjects are made as compatibility views. M$ recomends switching over from one to the other. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.90).aspx
SQL 2008 - Nothing changes but the server version. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.105).aspx
It is important to mention that not only do sysobjects and sys.objects have a differant name, they have a differant schema also. The column names are differant, along with some other things.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 10:29 PM
Points: 2,178,
Visits: 3,599
|
|
Thank you
Mohammed Moinudheen
|
|
|
|