Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase ««12345»»»

Largest Unit Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 4:52 AM
SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:44 PM
Points: 282, Visits: 37
I agree with all the other protestors.

1000^8=1024^8

Sorry, that dog won't hunt.

Secondly, where is the unit of measure? What is this a measure of, baby's breath and ether?

Thirdly, the "describing the whole universe". How many atoms are there in the universe? And the can be of how many different varieties? Made up of how many types of Muons?

I seem to recall an article on this site stating that someone was being sued for selling a terabyte drive that was only 1000GB. This question would seem to be of the manufacturer's ilk.
Post #479815
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 6:10 AM
Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:13 PM
Points: 307, Visits: 565
Geeeshhh...stop whining already...

This was a fun question that made you think and do some research.

Don't make more out of it than that. If missing the question ruined your day, you shouldn't play this game.

Here is a another reference...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yottabyte

Here is a reference to understand why the numbers are considered equivalent...has to do with context.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilobyte

Oh, and I missed it too...but I learned something.

Relax...enjoy life! Its Friday!



If it was easy, everybody would be doing it!;)
Post #479874
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 6:27 AM
SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:20 AM
Points: 277, Visits: 410
Hmmm.... I assumed the question was specifically about pages, extents, and allocations in SQL Server. I had no idea that it was about general computer storage. Missed it, not a big deal.

Post #479892
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 7:00 AM


SSChampion

SSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampion

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 12:06 PM
Points: 10,910, Visits: 12,546
Anthony K. Valley (4/4/2008)
Hmmm.... I assumed the question was specifically about pages, extents, and allocations in SQL Server. I had no idea that it was about general computer storage. Missed it, not a big deal.



I thought the same. I also, as someone else posted, did not notice that it was one with multiple answers. If I had I still would have gotten it wrong as I actually used calculator to find out what each expression was and found that there were 2 final answers, so I would have chosen 2. I definitely think that the QOD should have some context though.




Jack Corbett

Applications Developer

Don't let the good be the enemy of the best. -- Paul Fleming

Check out these links on how to get faster and more accurate answers:
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Need an Answer? Actually, No ... You Need a Question
How to Post Performance Problems
Crosstabs and Pivots or How to turn rows into columns Part 1
Crosstabs and Pivots or How to turn rows into columns Part 2
Post #479921
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 7:36 AM
SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, April 07, 2014 10:28 AM
Points: 2,388, Visits: 1,007
This question baffled me for the same reasons already mentioned.
10^24 <> 1 024^8
This is the second time this week the "poorly worded" QOD caused numerous comical replies. Maybe I will start waiting until tomorrow to answer today's question! QOT - In the end, I certainly enjoy the comments while learning more about the topics. Thanks all :D
Post #479970
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 7:39 AM


Mr or Mrs. 500

Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:20 AM
Points: 583, Visits: 1,060
Education is the goal, entertainment is the medium :D

--Shaun


Hiding under a desk from SSIS Implemenation Work
Post #479971
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 7:57 AM


SSC-Addicted

SSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:22 AM
Points: 453, Visits: 102
That reminds me of an old joke:
What’s the difference between mechanical engineer and computer geek?
Mechanical engineer thinks Kilobyte is 1000 bytes.
And computer geek thinks kilometer is 1024 meters. :D
Post #479984
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 8:29 AM
Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:21 AM
Points: 358, Visits: 396
More than 1 YB is needed, it seems to me. Since the information being stored is within the universe it is storing there must be a mechanism to denote that there are now 2 copies, the original and this stored one. So yet even more storage is needed.
Post #480016
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 8:32 AM


Mr or Mrs. 500

Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500Mr or Mrs. 500

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:20 AM
Points: 583, Visits: 1,060
Aleksandr Furman:

How is that funny?

Is that not the truth? ;)

Like the one told to me by an accountant;

"There are three types of accountant in this world, those who can count and those who can't" :D

--Shaun


Hiding under a desk from SSIS Implemenation Work
Post #480019
Posted Friday, April 04, 2008 8:34 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:14 AM
Points: 1,344, Visits: 1,983
Another poorly thoguht out and wrong question.

As mentioned, 1000^8 <> 1024^8. 1Yb (Yottabyte) is not the same a 1Yib (Yobibyte, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte). In fact, even the article referenced http://en.linuxreviews.org/Yottabyte points out that the binary value is bigger!

So only 2 answers were correct, not four.

The second error, taken from the article, is the claim that a "Yottabyte can, in theory, store everything in the entire universe." The latest estmates put the number of particles in the universe at somewhere between 10^72 and 10^87' http://www.strangehorizons.com/2001/20010402/biggest_numbers.shtml, which is a lot bigger than 1000^8 (10^24). If you add that, for a model of the entire universe (which is what I interpret by "store everything in the entire universe") you also need positions and velocities (and other properties) at some specified precision, so allowing a kilobyte for each particle takes the upper value to 10^90.

So now we start getting near to a really big unit of storage ...

1 Googolbyte = 10^100 bytes! :)

Since the Si system was only extended in 1991 to include the Yotta- prefix, I'm sure it will be extended again once someone finds a need!

P.S. of course, the largest named number is the Googolplex = 10^(10^100), i.e. 1 followed by 1 Googol (10^100) zeros, but "Googolplexbyte" is a ridiculous unit of storage. :P

And anyway why would anyone ever need more than 640Kb<<<<<1Yb?:)


Derek
Post #480022
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase ««12345»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse