|
|
|
Old Hand
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 5:07 PM
Points: 310,
Visits: 26
|
|
Joe,
Thanks for the article and the technique. I like the idea and think it will work well in a number of situations.
I am unsure why 'Herb' is attacking the subsequent contributors though. Surely discussing the pro's and con's of various ways of tackling the issue adds to the value of the article.
It also may provide feedback on con's the author had not thought of. I personally like the technique above but it does not ensure the last task completes which is sometimes required.
|
|
|
|
|
Right there with Babe
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:18 AM
Points: 772,
Visits: 1,825
|
|
An open discussion can bring out many good things. Herb is OK though. It is right to question everything. Even the forum process. Questions are the things that spur research. We all have ideas. Some good, some not so good. It is by putting forth the ideas that we see if they can stand and walk on their own (like children). We can openly debate ideas and techniques. We must not debate people. If some one is out of line, that should be handled one-on-one and off line. I don't see anyone out of line here. Outside phycists and cosmologists we IT folk have just about the most free and open discussions of any group that I have been part of.
ATB
Charles Kincaid
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, March 02, 2013 7:18 AM
Points: 64,
Visits: 128
|
|
OK guys - thanks for your input on that subject. Anyone have anything else to discuss on the article?
|
|
|
|