June 23, 2015 at 3:49 am
I see so many jobs for these guys.
Luckily, I am already quite big. But I feel sorry for the hobbits and small guys, who are otherwise perfectly qualified for the position.
Size-ist, that's what it is.
If you haven't even tried to resolve your issue, please don't expect the hard-working volunteers here to waste their time providing links to answers which you could easily have found yourself.
June 23, 2015 at 4:44 am
I think engineering data should be a crime - it would be nice to send who engineer data to mislead into penal servitude, regardless of their size. Especially if there were any competent honest politicians left to make (and unmake) laws.
But it won't happen until after Turkeys have votes for Thanksgiving.
Tom
June 23, 2015 at 8:49 am
Big is all relative. The title here is about "big data", which is an overloaded, hyped term meaning multiple things from JSON structured data to lots of text files.
June 23, 2015 at 9:03 am
Being neither big nor an engineer I'm not really qualified to play with any data, but I do, and there are plenty of tables under the roof here which are in the hundreds of millions of rows.
Should I eat more?
For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
June 23, 2015 at 7:21 pm
Heh... there is no such thing as "Big Data". There's only 2 categories of data insofar as size... 1) that which you can handle and 2) that which you can't. ๐
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply