|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:26 AM
Points: 1,581,
Visits: 795
|
|
okbangas (10/16/2012) If it were different in two supported editions of SQL Server, I agree. However, SQL Server 2005 is not supported anymore, so this question is correct for all supported editions of SQL Server. I didn't realize SQLServerCentral had support dates too. Microsoft has SQL 2000 on Extended Support for another six months or so, and SQL 2005 is still in Extended Support too... ("Microsoft offers a minimum of 10 years of support for SQL Server products.") What are SQLServerCentral support dates? I got today's question correct, but only because I'd recently been studying for the 2008 exams...
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:53 PM
Points: 7,182,
Visits: 7,281
|
|
Rich Weissler (10/16/2012)
okbangas (10/16/2012) If it were different in two supported editions of SQL Server, I agree. However, SQL Server 2005 is not supported anymore, so this question is correct for all supported editions of SQL Server.I didn't realize SQLServerCentral had support dates too. Microsoft has SQL 2000 on Extended Support for another six months or so, and SQL 2005 is still in Extended Support too... ("Microsoft offers a minimum of 10 years of support for SQL Server products.") What are SQLServerCentral support dates? I got today's question correct, but only because I'd recently been studying for the 2008 exams... We've had this debate before, and the concensus seemed to be that QotD refers to SQL Server versions currently under full support, not those under extended support, and that the version has to be specified if and only if there is a version currently in full support for which the answer is wrong.
Tom Is minic a gheibheann béal oscailte dorn dúnta. Is minig a cheapas beul fosgailte dòrn dùinte.
http://es.linkedin.com/in/tomthomsonsoftware
|
|
|
|
|
Say Hey Kid
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:18 AM
Points: 691,
Visits: 1,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:26 AM
Points: 1,581,
Visits: 795
|
|
L' Eomot Inversé (10/16/2012)QotD refers to SQL Server versions currently under full support, not those under extended support
Excellent. Thank you.
And, of course, good question today.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 5:51 AM
Points: 560,
Visits: 184
|
|
I concur with kapil190588 that the version should somehow be mentioned.
Please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142551(v=sql.90).aspx - noise-word list (LIST!)
|
|
|
|
|
SSChampion
        
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:43 PM
Points: 10,990,
Visits: 10,576
|
|
Aleksl-294755 (10/16/2012) I concur with kapil190588 that the version should somehow be mentioned. Please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142551(v=sql.90).aspx - noise-word list (LIST!) Not NoiseList then?
Paul White SQL Server MVP SQLblog.com @SQL_Kiwi
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:32 AM
Points: 1,592,
Visits: 352
|
|
kapil_kk (10/15/2012) As sql server version was not specified so I selected NoiseList but got wrong... I think version should be mentioned in question.. learn new thing today.......
+1
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:00 AM
Points: 854,
Visits: 1,273
|
|
Nice question! I would have gotten this wrong without some research. The name seems counter-intuitive, doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:39 PM
Points: 3,250,
Visits: 65,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:26 AM
Points: 1,354,
Visits: 435
|
|
|
|
|