|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:54 AM
Points: 27,
Visits: 421
|
|
No, you are missing the power of using schema. You should not put everything under dbo.
Jason http://dbace.us
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:01 PM
Points: 32,899,
Visits: 26,779
|
|
I know this is an old article but I'm glad I found it. I agree 100% for homegrown stuff. Sure, if you have to follow a given naming convention to support a 3rd party app, your hands are pretty much tied. I also don't give a hoot about ANSI compliance because truly transparent code portability is a myth and not using the advanced extensions available in each "brand" of an RDBMS is like having a scientific calculator and only using the 4 basic functions.
--Jeff Moden "RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
|
|
|
|